Every war story doesn't need a "heroic" side. I'm all for variety. Make them both awful or make them both flawed to a certain extent.

She's really pushing her luck to the limit. If not death, she should really have to go through a lot to get that revenge kill.

"watching the mainstream white media"

I disagree. To write a war where both sides are really unlikeable is a pretty good idea, specially if the characters are well written, which is the case for Stannis at the very least.

That and also to enjoy the ride. At least that's what it seemed like from her expression.

I hope even if people don't like his character they can at least respect his undying devotion to her queen. It's really admirable in my opinion.

We could've used a scene establishing him flying around before all of the ruckus started. As it stands, it just seemed incredibly convenient and lazy. Him attacking the bad guys and only the bad guys when he was established as the most rebellious of the three is also kinda dumb.

Didn't he start attacking them before they attacked it?. His sudden appearance is just way too convenient for me.

The final scene with the dragon was so convenient, so, so very convenient. I'm willing to believe that dragons are capable of being that smart to distinguish friends from foes on orders or something (with training), but wasn't that one the wildest and most rebellious of the three?, and he came right in time, knew who…

He's just desperate to be with Daenerys and serve her. Even dying in front of her would've been enough at this point.

Once again Arya is behaving like an amateur and testing her luck as hard as she can. What a disappointment.

If you mean to say that they should've followed the book's storyline then it's a fair point. I'm not a book reader so I'll concede you your opinion in regards to the series vs the books.

I don't have anything against people preferring the book's version rather than the one the TV show presented. I'm only arguing that since the writers for the show decided to go down this road, there wasn't any way to avoid that scene, unlike some people in this comment section has been saying without relating it at…

At least he lived a comfortable life and the rest of his family presumably loved him. That wasn't the case for Ramsay

I understand what you are saying now. I that sense, I agree with you. It would've been nice if she resisted, but I think she didn't because:

It couldn't have ended well for Sansa no matter what she said or did. This is Ramsay we are talking about, the sadist who takes immense joy in making his victims cry and scream as much as possible. As much as she wants to be a player, she was nowhere near ready to face him or to seduce him to reduce her pain. The…

Oh, I didn't know since I don't read the books. I thought it came out rather natural but If I were a reader then I suppose it would've been rather weird for them to add that.

Yeah and his father is a special kind of monster. I despised him for what he did at the red wedding, but I thought that he was just a power hungry murderer with no morals.

I'm sorry to hear that. I'm glad you can at least see it now with a bit of irony.

" Theon is now unredeemable". To you maybe. I saw a broken man who has suffered months of both physical and psychological torture suffering for a woman he cares about. The only way his potential rebellion against Ramsay makes sense is that this event is but the start of him finding himself. To have him attack Ramsay…