The City of Chicago’s Revenue department just shit its collective pants.

That is not remotely accurate.

If any one conservative supports the CDC’s actions here, they should be flayed alive in the public square for questioning the fundamental Republican Party platform plank — one of the few actual policies they have left — that regulation is a communist plot meant to strangle the Machiavellian perfection of the…

How long before Fox News starts crying that Ozempic is a Democrat [sic] plot to kill off Trump supporters, who are probably overrepresented among the obese and/or diabetic or something?

I’m thinking the typo “speech-to-text” in place of its converse is one of the more entertaining things I’ll see all day today.

I don’t think a full-sized one is necessary here; a Barbie-scale example should take care of what we need.

*prosthetic

It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off for ‘em.

is there a reason that only Creamy was chosen for this list? because crunchy is the way to go

Here’s a keyring-mountable combo spring-loaded centerpunch and seatbelt cutter:

As an old fart who couldn’t make it up those stairs in a week, I couldn’t help but notice that you only said you go down those steps several times a week; not up.

I did not know that even I could be this pedantic, but...

the above is presuming that, given the original mass was on a collision course, that the majority of debris is *still* on a collision course.

Hah! As Pluto can tell you, by definition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet), neither of these things can be called a planet.

The “wild speculation” occurred only after the woman was safe at home, right? The cops still did their job?

I vote we should all boycott AA for the same three years.

Agreed if that was the intent. Maybe I’m seeing what I want to see, but I read it as sarcasm, commenting on what a renewed surge of misogynistic court decisions and legislation have brought us to.

...bozos like Tom Brady who do not need more capital...

IANAL, but this seems like a clear lawsuit to me: Contract terms are only enforceable if they are presented in a reasonable way. The fine print on the back of a ticket that you can’t even read until after you’ve made the purchase is both too little (literally) too late as well as not reasonably presented. Presenting…

I don’t think that’s true. My experience has been that airlines will do exactly what Vic said: set a deadline after which open seats already sold to no-shows are reseated with stand-by passengers.