More people are killed by blunt objects than by nuclear weapons as well. However, because nuclear weapons can kill many more people at a greater distance than blunt objects (just like handguns), it is considered prudent to limit access to them.

Okay, let’s back up. The referenced Boston PD posting leads with the following:

I have read postings from these representing themselves as commercial pilots which explain that the cockpit windows of a commercial airliner will refract the light from the laser so that (a) the entire cockpit is filled with light and (b) the entire window becomes opaque.

I don’t know which is more horrifying — that I opened this “article” solely to see who could possibly give even the slightest fuck about celebrities cheating on each other, and saw that 187 people were ready to disappoint me, or the fact that the “author” of this “article” seems to think that rebooting Xena: Warrior…

That’s because it was enacted in 2004. No measurable changes in Illinoisans’ driving behavior ensued.

Or an old man in a hat.

Actually, it took effect in Illinois eleven-and-a-half years ago: Jan 1, 2004. Troopers mostly write warnings. I can’t find any hard data on how many tickets have been written (beyond early coverage that put it at about 350 - 400 a year), but that’s moot: The fact that nobody knows that the law exists is proof of its…

(Except for all the other wackily progressive decisions this week, Damn. Did someone spike the Supreme Court water supply with acid?

Your FB friend who posted that the present court “still remains the most conservative, activist, and repugnant court in more than a century, and the steady chipping away of all other constitutional rights will continue unabated” is absolutely correct. This decision is an exception to the trend of Hobby Lobby, Citizens…

You are correct, sir.

But my reply was dimensionless...

There is no engine design with which I am familiar which includes a part called a "dipshit."

Making claims that the cop somehow was about to kill the biker is an outright lie! an accurate analysis of the video evidence.

"Four/All Wheel Drive and increased ride height don't make your car magically great in the snow. Those things are great if you're off roading and conditions are bad, but on your commute to the office? Not any better than anything else."

"A rear wheel drive car fitted with proper snow tires, in the hands of a good driver is as good as anything else in the snow."

THANK YOU Nyrulez, for the hysterical irony of the self-referential comment "every black and white argument is surely a sign of naivete."

Playing the devil's advocate (note the correction to your incorrect correction) is in no way playing the part of a fool — nor that of a straw man or a knee-jerk negativist. It is a valuable tool used to interrogate the completeness and validity of a position, by searching for all possible arguments against that…

Willie's Roadhouse is a program on the Outlaw Country channel. Glad I could clear that up.

And I personally hate the minority of dbag kids on crotch rockets who do ride like total assholes, causing cagers like you to actively hate the majority of us, who observe property lane usage, signal our turns and changes, and respect the other vehicles with whom we share the road — and who speed no more or less than…

No, he's saying that he LEGALLYpassed the guy on his right in his own lane squeezing between his car and a parked set of cars. The only problem you are having with your reading comprehension is understanding that Wes is implying that lane splitting in CA allows this stupidly dangerous maneuver.