+1 dose of southern hospitality
+1 dose of southern hospitality
Acura grills, Acura mill’s
Check out the oil my Acura spills
Matter of fact, candy paint Acuras kill
lol. ok.
I’m not sure if that’s a challenge won. A newspaper op-ed from a town outside of Wichita in 2013 says it all:
That’s a bushism if I ever saw one
Hey, guess what? Abdullah: not on our team. Beat him. Chaudry: not on our team. We beat him. Okoye? Sorry, guys, not on our team. But we beat that guy, too!
I’d challenge anyone to find a worse governor. I make plenty of money. I pay 0 state income tax. The state, when faced with a huge budget deficit, had the opportunity to change that. Now, even if the KS legislature was a reasonable bunch and passed such a bill, Brownback would have vetoed it.
Would honestly be better than the current governor in Kansas.
Speaking of reading comprehension: rape isn’t even a civil cause of action, which is what I asked for considering the monumental differences between civil and criminal law.
See? That’s not true at all. All of the civil things you cited have statutes of limitations, but they don’t start running until they are discovered an/or run on each offense individually. Furthermore, rape is a criminal offense, not civil. And even then, The vast majority of states have statutes of limitations for…
And what kinds of legal challenges have no statute of limitations? Murder has no time restriction. Drawing a blank on any others—especially non criminal ones. Gimme two civil examples that don’t have a statute of limitations or some other time restriction.
lol.
Cute. Still in your 3L year, bud? Because only law students or attorneys without jobs care about the tier of the law school you went to. Once you’re practicing for a few years, all that matters is how much money you can bring the firm, to your partners, and whether you can win in court, to your opponents. Speaking of…
Graduated, pal. With honors.
LOL. So neither you nor him can refute me. Great. Are you trolling? it seems like you’re trolling. Especially with this:
I think he (and you apparently) needs to go back to law school. 3 years apparently wasn’t enough.
“you’re just wrong. I could totally explain it, but I don’t want to.”
Lol. Troll on.
Did you....did you dismiss my last reply? Because it looks like you dismissed it, which is hilarious if that is the case.
Because then the Redskins wouldn’t be singled out. It makes cancelling it now less of an issue of violating the law, but a political witch hunt. Furthermore, because it’s a rubber stamp for commercial speech, all commercial speech is entitled to that protection in practice, and so it becomes a restriction on speech to…