True - it’s only effective if it’s genuine, and not an entry into a rebuttal.

You’re a UX designer with two phones and can’t figure out how to TXT or delete apps from Android?

What kind of jerk puts a jammed piece of bread, un-jammed side DOWN, onto the peanut buttered bread? And then photographs it? Like, that is definitely wrong unless they were documenting the wrong way to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Thanks. I was told in elementary school that the USA would be switching to the metric system soon so this is helpful there, too. It’s been about 45 years so I’m guessing any day now.

I just played freezer tetris the other day.

A couple of folks have pointed out that there’s an option to view as a list, but I can't see their replies to say thanks. So: thank you :)

Enough with the damned slideshows, especially when there’s 40 of them to go through.  Just list the stupid things and make it easy for your readers.  

I mostly agree with you but there is a big difference in student loans and a car loan or a mortgage. If worse case scenario you can walk away from the car loan or the mortgage and/or you can declare bankruptcy. Student loans don’t allow that. Of course, those loans have some collateral whereas a loan to go to school…

Thank you for not making this a slide show.

Not gonna lie, I’d genuinely appreciate the four-slice toaster.

Wow... They can’t simply recommend a product that they like without being told to fuck off... This is the person you like being?

I get both sides. As someone not vaginally blessed (coin-purse cursed? dong doomed? man damned?) but old enough to know how things work, I am more than willing to admit my junk acquires the funk throughout the day. Even during a nice lazy chill work from home day in my perfectly comfortable 63 degree office. If there…

and that is their right

I make the recommendation as someone who is vaginally blessed and is a fan of the products.

For the vaginally blessed might I recommend - The Honey Pot Company for keeping things fresh

Yeah, screw all those people with underlying health conditions! They don't even deserve to be included in statistical survival rates of an easily communicable disease!

Google “long COVID” and get back to me on the quality of life of that entire “survival” thing.

Can you please link to the study that found this number? I’m interested in learning more.

This just ain't so, Mike. It might have been the original sentiment, but like calling someone "Karen" it's become an ageist way of telling someone to shut up.