Tim Drake > Jason Todd. Also, it would be great to see a Braniac in the first trilogy of Supes movies and come back as a main bad of a later film.

I do not think Quantumania’s Kang is meant to be the “good” Kang, and I don’t think we’re meant to see him as that even after the end credits. All* Kangs are evil, it was simply that this Kang turned his evilness more directly against his alts, but ultimately for his own aggrandizement. He still destroyed…

WHY didn’t Kang, if he truly was the “good” Kang, just come out and say that he was trying to stop all the evil alternate Kangs that want to conquer the multiverse rather than threaten to kill anyone that stands in his way?

The Court of Owls, I felt, were sort of hinted at in Pattinson’s Batman, so I expect them to appear in that trilogy. Would Gunn be cheating by including them in his five?

I’m still thinking someone will say “Critical hit!” at one point. 

It’s not like they have to go meta in narrative since, when they want a laugh, they can just have the characters and world *act* like a gaming table does.

See the recent ‘Speak with Dead’ spot. 

Perpetuating a lie because you’re an idiot is one thing. Perpetuating a lie when you know the truth but you don’t want to piss off your paymasters is entirely another.

For a community that’s fighting for acceptance and inclusion, they sure seem to be taking a page from the people they say are oppressing them.

It’s rude to JAQ off in public.

I would take you less time to Google why Rowling is transphobic than it took you to type out this comment, much less expect someone to reply to it.

Honestly, Rowling’s supporters really love their double standards. They’ll go out of their way to proclaim every Harry Potter project to be the greatest creative work in the history of the universe just because their idol’s name is attached to it, but then the moment someone has something negative to say, they demand…

Separate the art from the artist

Separate the art from the artist

You cant separate the art from the artist when the ‘art’ is what keeps her relevant and influential enough to promote transphobia on a massive scale.

Rowling has explicitly stated that she considers support for the HP franchise to be support for her and, by extension, for her transphobia. Given that Star Wars is now firmly in Disney’s hands and has been in the hands of many other people, it would be harder for Lucas to lay claim to the franchise in the same way.

Except JKR still has creative control over the franchise, so its not quite the same thing.

hmmm, interesting comparison, although I think that George Lucas explicitly selling the franchise to Disney (he still gets royalties??) could hypothetically softer the impact a lot more. It would amount to Disney doing some damage control, and further emphasizing how separate GL is from SW, I think.

Hearing that the game is a very bog-standard “AAA” release just makes the garbage people championing it to own the libs look all the sillier.

I did read the whole thing but I’m still not getting it, but it looks like you don’t actually think SAO should be here so we’re good hahaha

You lost me at being confused about why SAO isn’t here. You know this is a top 30, right?