claudiageorge01
Claudia George
claudiageorge01

That qualifier doesn't actually offset the fact that you still took the time to share your totally irrelevant and stupid opinions about women's bodies.

Alternatively:

It's incredible how just having male children can turn some women into the most repellant of gender traitors. Honestly, it's almost as though carrying something with a Y chromosome for nine months causes some physical transformation in their brains, allowing them to turn against themselves. It's like a phenomenon from

Who? I was replying to "thebloodofthematador" to say that I agree with her/him. It does sound badass.

I'll suggest that you raped someone.

It's easy to condemn vigilantism when society is set up to protect you and your rights. Notice that the police turned out in full force to protect MALE bus drivers after just two male deaths. Unknown thousands of femicides take place every year in Mexico and the US as a matter of course and are treated as a matter of

The ironic thing, though, is that rich women pay less, not more, to look beautiful. It's the same phenomenon we see with education and transportation and food. The poor and middle class get over charged for products that are of poorer quality or out right bad for them and the rich actually end up getting a deal.

"To be fair, the kind of man to whom a "non-fuckable" woman is invisible is not worth thinking about unless he happens to be your boss and he actually makes decisions — consciously or unconsciously — based upon the fuckability meter."

Just to be clear, to me "fuckability" has nothing to do with attractiveness. Of course there are many desirable mature women. But none of them are "fuckable."

I disagree in some fashion. I think that when you hit a certain age what happens is that your class status trumps your fuckability status. It's still just as important to have the right hair, makeup and clothes. But the goal is no longer to communicate "pretty" (i.e. "fuckable") but to communicate "upper class." Women

I think that the 1,000 words on how to be pretty (which actually could have been expanded) are necessary because they go to demonstrating the process of producing "pretty." I don't know that it was entirely pulled off in the article... but it's a hard thing to pull off, communicating how much artifice is behind our

That was pretty amazing.

I think it's lovely to see RuPaul interacting with this young woman, who was basically cannibalized by the patriarchy and its media, in a respectful, personable way. I found this very humanizing of Courtney Stodden. Major props to RuPaul for being such a standup guy.

I'm sorry, but that description doesn't seem that over the top. In fact, it seems pretty appropriate to the thing it is describing. That is one bizarrely stunning couch.

I think that there are probably very few 13 year old girls who couldn't be seduced by a smart, charming, good looking teacher of theirs. And almost no one who was actually 13 would think of it as "non-consensual" sex. That's what makes it such a sick crime. It's a rape that the victim might not understand as such for

"If "all women are different", then why marginalize women who actually like the softer, more female-POV-focused stuff you so casually dismiss?"

This bit is itself very progressive. It's a rape joke. But like all good rape jokes, the joke is on the rapist/rape culture.

It is a pretty ridiculous line. Like the rapists themselves were never 14.

The "biologically mature" line is the most disgusting. Because it's an outright lie. No 14 year old girl is biologically mature. The only way that you could entertain the ridiculous notion that a child of 14 is biologically mature is if you have the same standards for biological maturity that the fashion industry has