classicmoviesfan
ClassicMoviesFan
classicmoviesfan
Now playing

I see your channeling your inner Chris Rock. Yeah, Nice Guys are "low expectation-having mofos"

"I am not an abusive guy which means I'm doing the bare minimum for being a decent human being. Reward me with your pussy!"

That's a good point. I was so blinded by my rage at these abusive sports players who usually aren't held to the same standards as regular students in school. I think the lax education still leaves them underdeveloped and more prone to make bad choices, including abusive ones. But yes, it's true, you can be book smart

Isn't it funny how the 'real men' thing refers to action while 'real women' thing refers to appearance. "A Real Man raises his kids" and "A Real Man doesn't hit women" while "A Real Woman has curves (because women must be in constant competition in the goal of being physically appealing to men)"

The same myths of masculinity that gives us "real men _______" also give us the notion that men can sock women just cuz.

Yep. It takes on average, nine times for an abused partner to leave their abuser. It is also the statistically the most dangerous time for the abused partner as well.

That is the damn problem. I don't understand why we have to use competing definitions of masculinity to discuss how to be a fucking decent human being and NOT BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE.

So did Dr. Dre and John Lennon.

It makes them underdeveloped, dumb brutes as well. People who aren't smart and civil enough to express themselves with words often resort to violence.

Thanks. I've had this argument before with people who maddeningly think it's safe to say "the emperor has no clothes on". And I like to bring up Louis CK's stand up bit when he talked about how it's amazing that women date men when they're most likely to be harmed by men. It's funny because it's the truth and I'm sure

"It got wet over here" Get it?

I only saw the 1962 movie of Lolita with James Mason. Never read the book. Going by the movie, Lolita was the evil seductress while Mason's character was the sympathetic man done in by her 'feminine wiles' and manipulation. I hated that movie because it's bad enough to portray women as temptresses and men are

You're welcome.

Aww... it's okay. don't panic. You really don't need to over-think it.

I kind of agree with tbonius - I don't really see the "edgy" in espousing mainstream liberal values. It's certainly better than being a bigot, but the whole "being for equality and only 'punching up' is the *real* edginess" is quite a stretch. It feels like the whole "what's really cool is staying in school and

So many comedians have that chip on their shoulder from feeling they don't get as much pussy as they should. Their sexism comes from that entitlement and they're always able to find an audience because there are other guys with that same warped perspective. That's why it is important to constructively criticize

Oh, the desperation or self-hatred you must feel to marry a guy like that. It's like the women who marry Newt Gingrich. I know love or lust can't be driving them to marry these sexist, colossal narcissists, so I always figure it's an internalized sexism.

Yeah, either you're willfully ignorant woman or you're a masochist. It reminds me of the Chappelle skit of the blind black klansman who didn't know he was black. You want to ask each church woman, "Yeah, you know you're a woman right? All that terrible stuff they say about women applies to you." It's the same reason I

Anytime a wife said "Welcome home" to her husband. It was just a euphemism. I knew it! Dirty.

So, what if the woman invites other men to be guests at her home/vagina? She's not being a slut. She's just being neighborly and polite.