Montana is similar.  And also people that live way off the highway and fight giant snowdrifts just to get to town (like us).  Factory 35's would be killer on a rig that can also pull a trailer.

I mean the original tremor package on the old rangers was an off road package. The tremor f150 was the odd one out

Not that this is my kind of thing, personally, but I live in the Yukon Territory and there are a LOT of surveyors, drillers, etc who use trucks like this for legit off-road work.

Some curbs can get really big in Texas’ malls.

This is bullshit. If you’re going to take up my parking spots, at least let me get some of that sweet covered parking under the wings.

I would’ve at least expected Tim Ream to be caught out of position on this question.

Man, these guys really won’t defend anything.

That’s already more passing than a whole season of F1. 

Counterpoint: I don’t want people having easy view of what’s in my car. Also, tinting the glass means the greenhouse (as you put it) feels less like a real greenhouse after the sun has been beating down on my car all day.

Why would you want to get Morgan Freeman’s voice out of your head?

Don’t forget the over sized fuel line that snakes back and forth holding an extra 3 gallons.

more along the lines of “Tubing must be made of X material, and be a minimum of Y thing” But you find a way that maybe if you increase the thickness of the tubing you get a little more cooling so you run thicker tubing or you run a metal grid in it because the rules didn’t say “Only made of x material”

My friends who are engineers in NASCAR say they are told to make a proportion of cheaty designs for every legitimate design the develop, and it’s their bosses who decide which one to run in the race.

Often a rule is written to prevent something like automatically adjusting shock absorbers. The rule might say “damper rates at the beginning and end of the race must be within 1%”. Well, the smart crew chief would say, “Ok then, they can change in the middle of the race as long as we change them back”. Clearly against…

Not billions - not even close, unless you’re talking about the cost of running the entire NASCAR field.

Extensively limiting racing rules are always pushed as the governing body’s attempt to “reduce the cost of participating in the sport”.

neat things about our sport, is those guys’ ability to outfox Johnny Law.

I think what’s trying to say is, there’s always a competitive advantage. Up until the France family finds out and says “No.”

If it’s not written in the rules, it’s not cheating. That’s the plain and simple definition. And if you continue doing it after the new rule is written saying you can’t, then it’s cheating.

The old addage in NASCAR is there is Cheating (breaking the rules) and Cheatin’ (finding ways to exploit the rules).