Thanks for stepping in here. I appreciate your comments and the fact that you’re intelligent and reasonable enough to know that just because someone said somehing offensive it doesn’t mean you fight back with offensiveness. This thing about British people and teeth is so old, unfunny and offensive. No excuse for…

As someone whose research is somewhat related to this type of argument, men and women’s brains do seem to be different and there is a increasing volume of research that suggests that men and women solve mental tasks in different ways (not better or worse just different) and so it is entirely possible that one type of…

Women. We’re emotionally intelligent, yet we only date jerks and overlook all the nice guys who would treat us right.

This sort of petty in-fighting is why a man will never be president.

Gaaaa...the stakes are lower, but your headline and story is as factually inaccurate as Erdely’s piece. In DeRogatis’s own words, he wasn’t fired for disliking a shitty band, but rather for telling the Observer: “Jann Wenner is a fan of any band that sells eight million records.” Would anyone be surprised to get fired…

She'd be mad to do it. Too many people seem to love the quote - for good reason! To have it (mis)attributed to Hillary is a feather in her cap. She gets a good deal of the credit for saying something that, especially for a woman in her position, is actually a damn brave and explicit thing to say, without having to…

I would call her passionate and unafraid to speak truth to power. I have never once thought of her as angry, violent, or demonizing.

Maybe they're having trouble casting minorities because going on The Bachelor/ette is like, the whitest thing one could ever do.

A loner tries to drop knowledge via internet comments.

Can we just go ahead and officially rechristen her "Breadbags Pigcutter"? It'll save time.

Everybody is SO different, take other people's experiences with antidepressants with a grain of salt. I take 30 mg of Celexa a day and am probably heavier than I would be naturally, but it's worth it. To each their own.

Sometimes I wish we weren't dependant on an old ass document created by people who owned human beings as property for our ethical decisions.

I don't think this is comparable to FGM, don't think feminists hate men (most actual feminists don't find this kind of thing funny in my experience), and know misandry isn't a thing just think people laughing at someone being mutilated means those people are shitty. That's all.

Look, can we just call everyone an asshole?

I hate the fake-celiac sufferers as much as the next anonymous internet person, but asking someone to describe their disease before you take them seriously makes you an asshole. Do not do this.

Yes, why is it so difficult to believe that someone might actually have a real sensitivity to a food item and try to avoid it?

No, because Celiac's isn't the only way you are "allergic to gluten." You can be allergic or intolerant of gluten without having Celiac's. It may not be an allergy that is as fast acting as gluten, but those people are still within their right to avoid it in their meal.

I wish people would just stop being a dick about this. People have sensitivities to different things and when they choose to suffer through it for your benefit, or because they have to choose between two allergies or intolerances, don't jump up and down and be all "HA I knew you weren't REALLY allergic!!!"

It's an open secret that Coulter is a professional shock jockey who believes barely a single iota of what she says in public. Many of her friends are liberal and she' supposedly a cool person in private.