Miko is right, Brent should quit working for those scumbags. He won't. Know why? $$$$$$$$

The dream of the 90s is alive in Portland,, Portland.

I know right? Like where do people get off expecting you to have one iota of self control? If you can't live with the consequence, maybe you shouldn't be doing it.

Draymond Green is a goon because he used Hardens stupid comment against him? Doubt it.

It doesn't matter what you, I, or George Washington thinks about Russell Westbrook being non responsive to a reporter. It does matter what the people who sign his checks think tho. These people are expected to be professional while working just like me and you. And for the paycheck I don't think it's unreasonable to…

i call this one flat bills and cambria

Sometimes a dunks so good that the dunker posterizes himself.

Lizard person

They're expected to be professionals and be heavily scrutinized and be able to take it. The only person they have to respond to is the person who signs their checks, and I'll bet he hates this.

The whole vacated wins thing to me always took away from the gravity of the situation. If (as reported) JoePa was criminally negligent, than criminal charges are the only way to punish the individual. Vacating wins is not punitive when it involves enabling a child molester.

it's a joke, assuming they tried the best amateur team in the world would have 50 to 1 odds beating any NBA team, even the Sixers. That's before the logistics of having professionals play against court mandated amateurs, and than incentivising the whole thing.

It's demonstrably unviable for starters.

This would never work. You make it for profit that immediately eliminates college teams. Nba teams would not want to waste their million dollar talent playing essentially pick up games, and if a nba team played it most certainly would be a slaughter.

That isn't what she said, or is reported to of said, work on your reading comprehension before throwing a hissy fit.

just sounds stupid either way

Quakeoff

That's probably the best explanation. Did not know it was a direct quote, too bad if it is because you know a prosecution will dissect that comment to death.

bad joke is bad

But that isn't the question. Something either is or isn't against your will, not 30% for your will and 70% against it.

All for this woman getting justice, because that sounds terrible. But how do 100% believe something being against your will? Wouldn't your own will be something you would have direct knowledge of? Probably just bad wording.