I was directly responding to one piece of sentence he wrote:
I was directly responding to one piece of sentence he wrote:
What does “consensual and safe” porn mean?
Genuine question, do you think that boys can be both raised to respect all women and be raised on porn at the same time?
When women make as much as men it will benefit everyone.
If convincing yourself that abusers are good people is your pass time, you do you boo.
Why would he do that? Have you maybe considered the fact that he does not care about Amber Heard or women’s shelters or about taking serious action at all?
What do you mean by “Depp can do something too”?
Is Jezebel going to cover the story about Australian school girls?
No it doesn’t.
You’re wasting your on Jezebel. People here believe that the feelings and Muslim men (and yes, most religious garb is enforced by male family members because they don’t want other men to look at their “property”) should trample the rights and freedoms of women.
I just love how that person avoided answering your question. Probably because he or she knows the answer but it does not fit into their agenda.
The vast majority of Muslim men in France dress “Western” so you can’t dictate to them specifically what to wear.
Yes, he did. He even admitted that he though that the person was talking about Lot, when the person who originally posted stated that she was talking about Judges 19 in her first sentence. He did not even bother to read what she posted and already jumped down her throat.
He’s not having an academic discussion. He did not even bother reading the passage the person posted and already started arguing with them.
Angels are not my type.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.
It is your narrative.
Nothing? I doubt that you will ever admit that the reality of the story does not fit your narrative.
Earlier comment:
I am not discussing the point or morale of that story. I’m pointing out that the guy is wrong when he says that gender has nothing to do with women being offered for rape by other men.