So...it’s a gender thing?

You said that that story was not a “gender thing” and now say:

I know. But the guy is trying to argue that story had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they were women.

Except that your “it’s not a gender thing but a guest thing” narrative doesn’t make sense since the man and his concubine were also travelling with a male servant if you read Judges 19 in full.

I know which comment you’re replying to, which is precisely why I asked you the question I asked.

I don’t know whether you didn’t see my reply or just simply choose to ignore it, but I’m going to try again:

Why is the man’s concubine not considered a guest too? She came with the man (who is a guest) and stays at that house too but is for some reason not considered a guest worthy of protection and is offered to be raped instead of the man she came with.

Why was the man’s concubine not considered a guest and offered protection too?

I don’t know you or your dad so I can’t comment on your example.

What does “putting their money where their mouth is” means to you?

1/10 tbh.

Only those in power?

Nope. If a director wants to do a stripping scene or an ass shot than the actress in question has little power to challenge that. Directors are more powerful than even A-listers. They are, after all, the bosses.

Why not just use the words policeman and policewoman?

She looks the way the director wants her to look. I doubt that Margot has any say in it.

wut?

I would take anything Bild writes with a grain of salt. It’s a bullshit spewing tabloid.

According to The Guardian, that man was involved in violent incidents before. Why was he allowed to work at a restaurant in the first place? Should he not be behind bars for assault?

If I remember correctly, women were the deciding factor in Obama vs Romney in 2012. If American women did it 4 years ago, they will probably do it again.

No. I stay home all day and make money out of thin air. All my groceries and other life necessities are delivered to me by Amazon.