I wouldn’t. Why are you asking?

Sure. How do you propose we do that?

No I’m not. You’re missing my point on purpose.

The statements “a girl/woman is not responsible for being harassed, raped” and “men will use a girl’s/woman’s appearance and behavior to justify their actions” are not contradictory. I do not live in a perfect world where everybody holds perpetrators accountable for their actions and never blames victims. Maybe you…

Except that this is constantly happening in the first world. Are you going to claim that people don’t judge a woman’s sexual willingness by the way she’s dressed in the fist world?

Okay, but we are talking about school here, which has a completely different dynamic.

No. I think that you’re wearing rose-colored glasses because you’re under the impression that everyone believes what you believe in.

And is that working...?

What’s your solution to the problem then?

Do you honestly think that girls are safe now? Answer me truthfully, please.

But the school is not enforcing burkas, is it? As long as it’s enforcing something victims have a better chance at getting some sort of justice.

Please take off your rose-colored glasses and take a good look around you.

I don’t. Grown men do.

I’m sorry it happened to your child.

No? But it would make the excuse “she was dressed provocatively” harder to use to discredit to the victim and let the perpetrator of the hook.

Sure she’s not. But many men (and even some women) believe that the way a girl or woman dresses is an indication of her sexual willingness.

I’m sorry, but can you really not see how comparing the sexual harassment of young girls by men to a Texas teacher harassing a Muslim is completely...wrong? Especially since we live in a world where men being attracted to teenage girls is considered acceptable? I’m sorry do people regularly claim that they are…

You don’t have a concept, or a point.

You live in a fantasy land? Must be nice.

Except that I didn’t?