"Race to the bottom" was exactly the phrase that popped into my head when I read this entire post.
BerkRie
ciaobella-usa
As business people, they are actually pretty astute, so I wouldn't necessarily mock their intelligence (we paid for their shit for years, who's stupid now?). I deplore what I know of their motives, though.
First and most important, drink very little, as little as possible, and only red or white wine, preferably Burgundy, or tea or coffee slightly alcoholized.
The question of the moment becomes, who has the lower Q score, the Kardashians or Jenny McCarthy? I don't know who to root for here.
If it's something you can check your self (unlike the duodenum), there's no harm in doing so, and it frees you from too much dependence a potentially unstable/inaccessible healthcare system. I'm not saying everyone should do it, just that everyone should be able to if they want to.
A. It's not hard to learn proper technique.
You can obtain a speculum fairly easily (hey, what do you know! It's $9 on Amazon!), and then a hand mirror and a strong lamp, like a reading light, should do you. It's actually not that hard.
Oh no, not less is more! More info, more pictures, more knowledge! We should all be aware of our bodies and it's processes and how it looks/works. But don't try to call it pretty :)
I feel like Jez has suddenly become almost competitive in it's attempts to force us to be body positive about the most unpleasant female things possible.
On the upside, this has helped me move on from that absolutely mind-altering post about the 25-year-old blackhead.
Yerp.
I'll give it that it's informative. Every woman should know what a healthy one looks like, and they should know how to examine themselves, so I give the blogger full marks for social welfare. Just not "art."
That's a very good point. There's no need to fetishize a body part one way or the other (pretty or gross), it just is. Now, it's probably a good thing to know, objectively, what a healthy one looks like, so you don't have to depend on doctors constantly, but that doesn't mean I have to be all, "OMG, it's bee-u-ti-ful!"
As long as my cervix is healthy, I don't care what it looks like either. I get that we should all know what a healthy cervix looks like, and not depend on a third party to always be the one to look at our own for us, but that doesn't mean I have to declare it pretty.
Soooo... Does it make me a bad feminist that I don't think these pictures are "beautiful"? Educational, enlightening, fascinating, but not aesthetically pleasing to me.
Dr. Lee’s post pertained to personal correspondence between her and an editor at Biology-Online about a possible assignment for that network.
Can Florida go first?
There has been speculation about this over on Groupthink too, so I think you're not the only one who wants to know
This is why I can't really get into Vine. I want to hear/see the entire chorus, not just a phrase!