I've never heard a convincing argument as to why a type 1 diabetic who literally NEEDS insulin to stay alive should have to pay a co-pay, but a woman who CHOOSES to take contraceptives for no medical reason should get her prescription absolutely free.

But I *can't* control my libido!! Without Uncle Sugar in my life, I'd just be popping babies out all over the place! Please don't take away my no-baby pills! I'm a slave to my vagina!

Wow, that's incendiary and awful. Shame on you. No one deserves that.

Sorry, if you're a season behind you don't get spoiler protection. It expired long, long ago.

It's telling that she is attacking random people on the internet and Abbot but not the actual substance of the article written about her.

Right... if we followed the edicts of Jezebel to the letter, we'd be indulging every urge (sexual or otherwise) so long as we're "proud" and "own it." I guess I don't understand how we're supposed to shame people for being sexist/racist because we want to respect all human life, but then deny that basic courtesy to…

Ahhh, if you're not advocating screwing a different dude every night, Jezebel doesn't care!

This one time, I was lucky enough to be on the cover of a well-known fashion magazine. But then, this horrible website offered anyone $10,000 for leaking the original photographs, hoping to find out that the real pictures made me look fat and ugly. And then they kept on publishing stories about it....

Is it true that it's part of women's nature to smooth things over and be more collaborative? That's probably one of those things that's never going to be answered, but there are certainly lots of people out there - actual, scientifically inclined, with data and research supporting them, people - who argue that there…

Surely at some level there is a difference between in behavior btn the masculine and feminine that can be considered "natural"? Or do all these apparent differences boil down to socialization? I know we're generally equally capable of all types of behavior, but surely men have their set of natural propensities as do…

Oh, if only she had an R next to her name this would really be a fun comments section. *sigh*

Let's get a grip. This wasn't that bad. She clearly just mis-stepped with the word "nature." It's pretty well accepted that women are socialized to prioritize being liked and creating social harmony over pushing a certain set of ideas, and that that has long held us back when advancing our careers. That's all that…

It was an inartful statement. And unnecessarily gendered — as Waldman points out, everyone wants to be liked. But, Gillibrand, in not questioning the premise, makes a valid point - albeit without acknowledging that it's permissible for men to be respected for doing things that may cause them to not be well liked…

Honest question: what does the watermelon shaped cup thing refer to? What am I missing?

It's pretty clear at this point that Robin and Paula have some sort of agreement.

Why would you dedicate all of this space, on a supposedly feminist blog, to mocking an expecting couple for celebrating their sexuality? Because the underwear isn't to your taste? Not middle-class enough for you? I don't get it.

A coverspread showcasing a proud, pregnant woman in all her glory... I honestly figured the Jezebel Feminists would have been eating this up.

They should have done these for family and friends but definitely not a national magazine. I mean, it's a cute concept but I don't think they are being perceived that way. The poses are awkward and all around just weird. She looks great, though.

Those are not granny panties. There does exist underwear that is between a thong and matronly undergarments.

Only on Jezebel can we have ladies freaking out one moment about having all their bodily autonomy taken away the moment they get pregnant and being treated like walking incubators and then have posters come around to howl that someone was curling a relatively light weight in the rough vicinity of pregnant woman. What…