cherry-stems
Dali Lana Goo-Goo
cherry-stems

Well, I’m going to have to some googling on that BDSM rumor and schedule a flight to new york if it pans out.

Mad About You was one of my favorite after-school syndicated shows, and it certainly holds up better than Perfect Strangers and the like.

Is it a mistake for me to admit that I taped (taped!) “Mad About You” every Thursday?

Well, my fourteen year old daughter does, but only because she’s such a huge fan of “Twister.”

Was about to very angrily protest that I did. But then realized I’ve been 30 for 5 months now.

I was about to say, “I DO!” but then realized that I’m not under 30.

Samuel L. Jackson can relate to that story.

I don’t know about Peak Twitter, but that is definitely Peak Starbucks. They even spelled “Jodie” wrong!

Well who hasn’t been there before?

Somewhere, Leelee Sobieski is frowning at her Starbucks cup marked “Helen”.

My ex used to tell me similar stories about how his mother (an immigrant from a very Catholic Spanish-speaking country) would never leave him and his brother alone with the priests growing up. They were/are both strikingly beautiful and she just knew better (not that that is necessarily the determining factor, but she

I remember badly wanting to go further in modeling and acting as a child and my mom just would not have it. I did a few small shoots for print ads a commercial and theater and that was that. She was terrified of someone taking advantage of me when she wasn’t looking and even if that didn’t happens he just didn’t see

I read Shirley Temple’s memoir years ago. She was having a private meeting with the producer Arthur Freed and he pulled his penis out of his pants. Shirley fucking Temple! She was 13. If that could happen to a huge child star, who made so much money for the studio, imagine how the other less famous child actors were

Mrs. Rushruff and I have been blessed with two extremely attractive children. We’ve had professional photographers inquire about modeling jobs for them. We’re in Southern California and a family friend owns a casting company, so if we wanted them in movies or on TV we could. Without exception we have said “oh hellz

Re-read the article. He denied being abused himself. So, he either betrays a trust or gets sued OR both.

This is my possibly far fetched theory: is it possible that someone else is looking to come forward and name names, but confided in him to bring attention to it first as leverage? He’s well respected, has a clean media history himself, and it would make the announcement later come less out of left field.

In addition to what others have said, Wood provides a reason why he wouldn’t reveal the perpetrators - it might point to the possible victims and harm them further: “That’s the tragedy of attempting to reveal what is happening to innocent people. They can be squashed, but their lives have been irreparably damaged.”

He has no right exposing the victims who confided in him. And by naming a perp, it is almost certain the victim(s) will be exposed.

On the other hand, by putting this out there, anyone who is willing to name names knows that this guy will likely back them up, and it goes from there. I really hope this is the start of a conversation, not a single standalone statement.