chekhovsgumitsgonnapop
ChekhovsGum(ItsGonnaPop!)
chekhovsgumitsgonnapop

SNL isn’t reality tv. And the actors on the show are also its writers. And they all have years of experience in the arts - acting, writing, stand up comedy, improvisation, producing, etc. What I’m saying is, SNL cast members have skills and talent. Reality tv people do not.

We should be placing bets.

Yessss. And here I was about to comment that her hair was giving me Daenerys vibes. This needs to happen.

pitch for alternate trailer that would honestly convince me more to see this:

You must start from the beginning though to appreciate the rich tapestry at work here.

Thank you for saying that. I’ve been terribly disappointed to see so many “What did she expect?” and “LOL, karma!” comments about this case. Much more so on Gawker than here, but disappointing none the less. The way I see it is a victim is a victim, regardless of their worldview or occupation.

Exactly. This had me thinking about all the women who DID get the job...will they turn on Gretchen Carlson because the suit basically implies that they did what she wouldn’t? Ms. Kelly...?

If they’re afraid to come forward, I can understand why. They’ve got careers to protect and there’s very little doubt that this isn’t going to a clean civil affair where everybody respects everyone else’s personal space. I see a lot of character assassination for anyone who comes forth. I may not like Carlson as a

It was a mixed bag. Some good visuals, less racist than I thought it was going to be, but something was off with the pacing/tension. I actually found Jane super annoying but I couldn’t tell if it was Robbie or the way they wrote the character. Skarsgard was, surprisingly, completely perfect as Tarzan. SLJ was almost

“Was it hard to “do it”?” I whispered gently salivating into my children’s portioned French toast.

Audrey Hepburn is 2 words.

Yes, but one has a legitimate shot to effect change and push the Democratic party to the left, the other is a misguided and ill-fated publicity stunt that engenders animosity and contempt.

Yes. When the front runner is this far in front, it is the job of the DNC to move forward, doing what they can within the bounds of their rules, as they have actually been doing. They would be fools not to do so. They are doing their jobs. They’ve even tried to include Bernie in the process by letting him, in an

I would also add that Hillary did not only pull the Center Dems. I’m a progressive, and a registered independent, and I only had to glance at Bernie’s website to know he was not the candidate for me. I am not alone in this. I’ve posted it elsewhere on Jez, but this purity test liberal BS coming from the Berniecrats is

I still don’t understand why people have a problem with the leader of a political party only wanting people who have taken the time to officially become members of that party to vote in their primary.

I’m taking the gloves off with the Bernie faction. BTW, full disclosure, I voted for him in my state’s primary. This shit has got to stop. There is too much at stake for a bunch of bitching about the DNC essentially doing its goddamn JOB just because people are butthurt that not everyone who votes Democratic is as

As always, Dems always trying to snatch defeat out from the jaws of victory. IT LITERALLY DOES NOT GET EASIER THAN THIS, YOU FOOLS. STOP THIS INFIGHTING AND FOCUS ON DEFEATING THAT HATEFILLED BOTTLE OF SUNKIST KNOWN AS TRUMP.

Bernie wasn’t even a fucking democrat until just a short time before he decided that the year the woman, was running was his one chance to try out a presidential campaign. Of course the DNC wasn’t paying him as much attention - he was new to the party. He had all the time he wanted to learn how things ran, the rules

I mean I knew this was coming, I’ve seen the calls for people to join the lawsuit, but still. WTF people? Legitimately I ask... What. The. Fuck?

This is a super good use of the DNC’s time this general election.