Why the hell did a link from the Gizmodo frontpage put me on a Gawker page that linked back to the actual article on Gizmodo?
cheeseycom
cheeseycom
@Zubieta: Not the first two guys from the looks of it..
Not that I disagree with you or anything, it most likely isn't going to kill people just like that.. but your statement sounds a bit odd to me.
Yeah but picture captions do not an article make..
They're talking about things like Snow Leopard... I have a friend in an Apple store who got me a copy, but I've got to say it definitely wasn't worth the money I didn't pay for it.
After a certain point the whole 'evil you know versus the evil you don't' argument becomes moot.. if the current dictator becomes so extreme and his people are suffering so much, then whatever comes after couldn't really be much worse.
Is that a pic from when you first saw the new Gizmodo layout? ;P
Hmm the first talking head kind of reminds me of Keanu Reeves.. not so much in looks, but the lack of facial expressions and dull monotone speech.
Oxford saying 'sometimes' is completely at odds to you saying 'not at all', so I don't see how that supports anything you said.
The definitions of both grammar and semantics are very broad, and semantics is included (at least in part) within the definition of grammar. It doesn't have to exclusively be a subset of grammar to be part of it, it can exist as its own concept and be related to grammar at the same time.
Again, using overly complicated words where a simple one will do doesn't really make you sound more intelligent. Also, don't start making this about me, we were talking about @alleggerita's statement.
I stand corrected on the specific terminology. However, grammar is a set of linguistic rules that is comprised, in part, by semantics.. so what I said wasn't technically wrong.
It's the guy who played Kirk's dad; Chris Hemsworth.
..aaaaaand you should learn the difference between an error in spelling and an error in grammar when nitpicking about other peoples posts.
Stick a lot of cameras in butts, do you?
Would kind of defy the point of the video if they blurred out of the faces.. we wouldn't be able to see where they were looking.
It was closer to her waist than her ass, it'd be impractical to put it right on it since it would move loads and it would be much more obvious to people that it was there.... not to mention uncomfortable =S
Sorry, couldn't resist! =D
Nope, but you if you travel to a certain church in New Jersey, I know a guy who can sort you out.. ;P