That would require the whole group of them to admit they were wrong, which has never, ever happened in Gawker’s history. Even when they ran the reprehensible Conde Nast story and Denton had a change of heart (likely influenced by his lawyers), the despicable sack of crap known as Tommy Craggs decided to resign in…

I do love that the Gawker rallying cry basically boils down to “Hulk Hogan never would have been able to afford to hold us accountable for our bad actions if not for this guy and his money”. As if wronging people who can’t on their own afford to do something about it is somehow OK.

Peter Thiel is the gawker version of Benghazi

Oh, no, I got that part. Very clever. /yawn

If by Shitforbrains you mean someone who is not intrigued by sophomoric junk, then I’ll be right along, thanks. And you’re right, I don’t suppose I will be alone for long.

It's one of the stupidest things I've ever read on a Gawker site, and that is saying a lot.

It’s just one giant eye roll. These people are, to a person, deeply unfunny. They are not good at satire, sarcasm, or sardonicism (that word seems wrong but this isn’t my job so w/e).

I’m just as amazed someone thinks it isn’t a pile of shit.

Because it’s really stupid?

But Uber is a technology company that just facilitates independent car owners to create new opportunities for themselves. Why burden Uber and Lyft with anti-business regulations when in fact these are independent contractors that should be protected from government persecution, and other BS and whatnot.

He’s an 84 year old white man whose heyday was the 1960's.