Whoa, me likey. This is a really engaging style.

Ultimately you don’t want to create an unhealthy situation, but it’s up to the parents to decide what that is. You can love and support your kid without allowing them to dictate your social interactions.

It’s more like “We have an older show that people love that no longer fits our existing ad:content model. We can either edit the show to fit the model, or not use it at all. Speeding it up by a small fraction is preferable to removing entire scenes to make it fit.”

In my case it’s a combination of several things:

They can get some notoriety and free press this way. Maybe even a little sympathy for being “crushed” by the big faceless corporation.

Thanks for sharing your story Mark! :D

So she’s not responsible for what she did before, but B is? Why is he the asshole in this situation?

AGC - Yes, you are an asshole for sleeping with B. No, you should not tell A. You should probably break up with A though, spare him any more of your selfish bullshit, and then cut ties with B too.

*fistbump*

Was going to comment the exact same thing. This is some Grade-A Assholery right here.

Amen. I sort by function, or person, not by color. Never once in my life has this led to any kind of hilarious pink clothing.

That’s what I was thinking, too. That seems reasonable.

ABD: Always Be Donking

What’s with the versions that have the little flags on either side like they’re waving in an aircraft?

Very excited for Castlevania!

What exactly is being illustrated at 1:55? It’s highlighting the enemy health for some reason?

Those Amiibo look gorgeous (with the exception of the weird support placement on Urbosa).

*YOINK* Yes, please.

*YOINK* Yes, please.

That chomping into the fire flower effect was pretty great. Other than that, this was all pretty clunky.

Okay, but are we going to have to sail away from a happy totem friend and watch is get engulfed by the sea again? Because I’m still dealing with all of that from the first time.