They may also be booing because, according to twitter folks on the scene, the line was held up for over an hour so that Trump could place his vote.

There’s some cute ideas here but the surly model stomp and industrial-grunge setting seems really jarring against the happy-cute-fun vibe of the clothes.

In that scenario, there’s two things on Clinton’s side: the incumbent advantage and the fact that her approval ratings tend to be strong when she’s actually *doing* a job. *Asking* for the job is seen as inappropriately ambitious, but if she can get in, she’ll probably be less disliked during the next election.

I suspect it was probably done because her pale legs are more visible/defined against the darkest skin-toned dancer, rather than for consciously awful reasons. Still not a great idea, though.

Thursday was limited release and only evening screenings, I believe, which means it will be playing on more screens starting Friday, along with daytime screenings for an added revenue boost.

Stay to the very end, well after the dancing! There’s a post-credit treat!

It’s social commentary. Rich people do leave the country or lock-down behind secured walls. Poor people don’t have that luxury, so they wind up at risk. I don’t know about the current film, but the second one addresses this pretty explicitly.

It’s possible the employee was part-time for some or all of her time at the company, especially if she was able to complete a college degree in six years or less through night classes. Many companies automatically rank part-timers below full-timers for seniority considerations.