You’ve solved the world’s problems in one job posting.

The defense rests!

Except whose murdering them in France? They've clearly crossed the Mediterranean or walked through 5 or 6 safe countries. These actions would make sense at the borders into Europe, but not at the borders within Europe.

I mean, we also wouldn't see these actions if they didn't commit them.

Because keeping the stories would make them the single publication. Leaving them with Gawker makes Gawker the single publication.

This guy didn’t mention global warming. He’s talking about overfishing I think, unless I misread it.

Samsung should talk to Nokia.

Nothing that Bush didn't already do (btw, I'm not serious).

How is Cher not aware that OZ has been a whore for since he made it on TV? He’s a bigger embarrassment than DR. Phil because at one point he was an actually successful Doctor.

See guys! Thermite does melt steel beams!

PA’s sales tax is only on luxury goods, unless things have changed.

Shockingly, their hair products are pretty decent and don't smell like a high schooler trying to cover up the smell of swisher sweets.

Honestly, I'd definitely vote the Hillary ticket if I thought she was going to die. Kaine seems good. On the other hand, if every seems like they are going to live, I'll go third party.

Why have ‘em if you ain’t gonna use ‘em?

Oh, I was being sarcastic regarding the willfully obtuse poster who keeps disregarding the legal and accounting reason it was called a liability. Sorry for the confusion.

All pre-sale and post sale content is owned by Univision with the exception of those six articles. In theory every article could become the subject of a lawsuit and become liabilities. They will deal with that as it comes. Their mandate was to purchase assets only. An article with pending litigation is not an asset,…

They are judged on their merit at point of sale. At no point in the future will any of those articles generate enough revenue to even think they could go from asset to liability with litigation pending.

If it’s on the books as a liability, accounting wise, it is gone. That is how the sale worked. Clearly, Gawker and/or auditors determined it to be a liability during due diligence. Whether or not it actually ends up costing them doesn’t make a difference.

I want to see it in a t-chart. I'm convinced this person is being willfully ignorant regarding what they mean by liability.

Okay, so your mandate is to not accept any of the liabilities, only assets. Please do the t-chart of how you turn a liability into an asset, in the accounting sense. That should clear it up for you when you realize that isn't possible. Also, I will accept IFRS or GAAP accounting standards.