not advocating it, but consciously aware of just what it would taken to break them.

what i would advocate is we pack up and leave it all to sort itself out.

The kind of ‘tough’ you need to be is Mongol-level tough, where you disembowel women and children to make a point. You want to do that?
Nope, thats why im not saying we should go in and do such. but as you yourself said, thats what it would take

so build an overly complicated computer happy fatty fat fat pig?

tongue in cheek aside, the GT-R is a fairly pedestrian vehicle. stupidly fast when it was launched, and still quick today, but at its core its still a hopped up Nissan coupe.

Media outlets are updating and the FBI is on the hunt for a 28 year old Afghani.

was merely pointing out the vast differences in context in which they were used. adding even more to the shit storm we would be in for firing one off again

lots of differences really, chief among them is we aren’t in an all out struggle with the enemy.

we bitch-slapped Japan because it was the best out of a couple of very shitty options to end an all out war. we haven’t seen anything approaching that level of fighting in the Middle East, so jumping to that option is…

sadly yes, she still has a job

what we really bring are a handful of very precise and limited strikes from the sky. a fraction of what our forces are actually capable of delivering.

too many cars on the field at once? and id swear the WEC cars were moving a bit faster than their IMSA counterparts, but i could be wrong.

the loathing i have for those two is immense. im hoping they go bankrupt trying to fund that shit show.

I mean, why can’t they adopt the Japanese way of thinking and make a mass production version..
because its meant to commemorate a very specific car and accomplishment, as such would only be built for a limited time.

we’ll see about that on Thursday, but your boy should expect to be on his back quite a bit

That means whether the source is domestic or foreign influence, the US can expect terroristic attacks to continue until the attackers see that it does not affect change in US policy.
It wont matter if the policy changes or not, the aim of these attacks more than anything is to kill and maim.
so far as Jihad goes;…

Also, if we go over there and start bombing their innocent people, what makes us better then them?
Which is exactly why im not saying we should. Only that doing such is what it takes to destroy fanaticism on this level.

im confused here, given that the Boston Bombers were pushing foreign ideas (they lived here yes but the thinking was pure Jihadist).

as for the bombs themselves, there is a certain ease and accessibility that comes with it. i see that as practicality more than anything.

trouble is you have to get the entirety of Islam to stop the infighting first. half of the issue is this bullshit between the Sunni and the Shia, and since they wont fight like traditional armies anymore they turn to terrorist tactics, and then it all spills over.

ISIS are the easy ones to find, it’s the smaller groups that would be trouble.

The sooner we have no interests in the region outside of Israel the better. I cannot wait for the day we can tell the Saudis to pound sand

You can, it just requires nukes. Which we SHOULD NEVER FIRE AGAIN (if at all possible)

Problem isn’t the “true” believers, those guys are a thankful minority. The trouble is that locals who don’t take to Jihad are willing to harbor/fun them to wage proxy war. Kill enough of those people, rather violently, and they will stop harboring the fighters.