Left it a LONG time ago for much better racing (when I can catch it)
Left it a LONG time ago for much better racing (when I can catch it)
While it's true the closest I'll ever get to these cars is in a videogame.... Hell yeah for them being built in the first place!
I voted for calling this the “Hoon party” last week when it came up!
its not perfect but damn thats good!
In what way are MY actions less predictable? if anything its slower traffic that’s harder to predict.
someone cruising at passing speed is pretty easy to follow, they will move as necessary to maintain their speed. its the slow driving idiots that are likely to jump randomly into other lanes, typically without a…
I hope they do this next year, let's see a XJ takeover!
Because those limits are archaic and based on vehicle performance from decades ago when modern cars are designed to cruise comfortably at autobahn speeds.
http://ruero.com/23004-ancilla-…
should see the rest of her shoot. NSFW i might add
i wouldnt throw out a few direct attacks at the BBC, or some random use of the phrase “Big Black Cock”
hot damn!
Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember the idea being a small electric motor being used strictly for reverse, all gas motor for forward
what has been seen.... O.O
swear to god i will never EVER touch a new model VW bug EVER again, ive got a nasty scar on the top of my hand from one of those little bastards. NEVER AGAIN!
alright jalops, lets play whats that car!
id love to see a Clarkson guest column on here every so often, twould be brilliant!
and ill have to disagree with you on this one.
its not about the bells and whistles, a basic car does not need to be an appliance. it can be both cheap and lively, have character, and be fun without being speedy.
i agree on the needless bells and whistles, but many companies have lost what it means to be fun below 20K…
leaving what, ford chevy dodge honda toyota kia hyundai... you get my point.
further, the issue for me isnt their lack of reliability (they are very reliable) but WHEN they break down its a nasty chunk of change.
auh so much conflicting info!!!!
its all good though, meeting a fellow aero-nerd is always a plus
Got a link? All the info I've seen says Mach 1.2 at high altitude
meant to cross into space, the A was supposed to be the supersonic HA penetration but advances in missile tech rendered that point moot, the B model while being cheaper was reconfigured for low level strikes