and designed it to look like a battleaxe

trouble with that is potential payload. one drone could in theory carry a large enough chunk of C4 to cause hellacious damage. a swarm of them could easily blast their way through such a barrier and still have enough intact to slip through and hit the primary.

my only two thoughts are an RF signal jammer, or a…

actually if you know your weaponry, the only thing that could possibly be in that video is an aircraft.

though the footage is garbage, it does show something large hitting the ground before slamming into the building. missiles and bombs dont behave like that, they would fly straight into the wall or do whats called a…

can you really defend against something like that though? cost effectively speaking not to mention the terrorists still need to get their hands on explosives and thats so far been their downfall.

and a coordinated attack involving a swarm no, but it has been attempted via RC planes.

i didnt say it was a good driving car if measured on its own. but stacked against the best of the world, its no standout.

its number 35 on the list in base form, Chevy built a faster Camaro for less than 1/4 the price.

its also a full 5 seconds slower than the 458 Italia. a car that was 200K less brand new.

except as Doug on here and Clarkson have pointed out, there really hasnt been much trickledown.

secondly, as amazing a technical exercise as it was, its STILL slower than most of its competition and thats what matters in that price bracket.

ok, so i cant be the only one imagining this system setup to literally walk the chopper into a parking area.

in stead of rolling around you have a bunch scuttling around an airfield like giant insects.

creepy. awesome... but creepy

broke something in all the best ways, good GOD that is sexy

what did you click to get the interiot color to match the exterior?!

they get credit for building an amazing piece of engineering, but as fas a performance car its meidocre. when compared to its primary competition

in fairness the V10 was built by yamaha

i dunno if that would work anymore. that stuff is so tied up in the computer that pulling a fuse might actually disable something important

so why not change the culture instead of catering to it? that level of inattentive stupidity is a big problem here because we hand out licenses like candy. our requirements to be allowed to drive are laughably low, as such we have a ton of people on the road who really dont belong there, and its they who primarily…

as if we needed more proof there is no such thing as taste in the mid east.... christ what an eyesore

better? no. more user friendly yes, but that right there is why id go with the Swede. i want a car to DRIVE not an appliance that i pilot.

and just for the record, you can do that run in the Agera with NO hands on the wheel. they have some sort of super fancy traction control system that holds the car perfectly…

i wonder if its possible to hack into the ECU to disable that garbage

funny story my dad told me, around 20 years ago a woman bought a brand new corvette, and tried to take a corner at plus 60 because she thought the “traction control” would jsut make the car take the corner.

or maybe because we believe if you accept the responsibility of piloting a two ton piece of machinery you should be focused on that task, instead of relying on the car itself to carry the workload allowing you to pay less attention. will this make newer cars safer, yeah probably. but it will also make drivers reliant…

*sighs* just one more extra added expensive i neither want nor need.