chaos2992
chaos2992
chaos2992

If they can get it right, it might help less socially inclined dm’s with npc interactions and dialogue. Train the ai to respond as X npc who knows X information. Player speaks into the mic and the AI generates dialogue for you to read back to the player and make changes based on DM preference. I’ve experimented a

Google Maps Go is supposedly a simplified version of the app. or at the very least, its supposed to work better on lower-end phones with like less ram and such. I haven’t used it, but that should mean there’s less bloat.

Funny, I turned off its ability to say anything ages ago with the flip of a toggle that took me 10 seconds to find.

Lets be honest, though, companies have gamed the law plenty of times as well against individuals they just didn’t like. its kinda neat seeing the same being done in reverse. probably wont end well for him since they actually have a legal budget, but it would be nice to see this prompt the tightening or sealing of some

Yeah, probably for the best. Rogan’s style isn’t really something the MCU needs. So he’s right to be afraid of creative differences.

Considering the age he is when the original trilogy happens and how he was basically just getting started during rogue one, they may hint at it. Like I don’t think they’ll show the whole journey with any significant time spent there. Whatever happens in the show will happen, and then in the last few seconds of the

Nah, anything on the ds or later is a departure from standard 2d Zelda titles. But I agree that minish cap should count.

So I haven't really paid attention to Castlevania until the Netflix show. Doesn't Dracula play a part in pretty much every game? Or are there different main baddies that show up?

any ads are too many. that being said, pot meet kettle, kotaku.

who knows about pay, but regarding treatment, signs look good. the long development time was probably specifically done to avoid crunch and give developers the time they needed. The rest of the gaming industry insisting BG3 is a anomaly and dont want to be held to the same standards is also a pretty promising sign.

I felt the person I was replying to implied that the IP owners would be paying to have their IP show up in Fortnight. Yes, I know how licensing works.

That may be, but if I were the owner of all this IP, I'd be making fortnight fork over the money, not the other way around.

What won’t fortnight gobble up to stay relevant? Free advertising for those who let it happen I guess.

Exactly. I see no reason why if the actor is okay with that for the individual project, why it would be bad to do. I’m a pretty big hater of Ai in most other things, but as long as the actor gets to dictate when/where and how it’s used, I don’t mind it. it should be illegal for a corporate entity to own an AI voice or

I don’t mind its inclusion, as long as it isn’t where more than 20 percent of where the game’s important content takes place.

That's cool, and totally your choice and your contract should let you dictate that.

Ordinarily I'd agree. Except perhaps in a reprised role. The original actor still does the lines, but the AI dubs over with the younger voice. Unless the actor just doesn't want the role, then yeah, new blood.

I could see AI making a VO’s job easier. Especially those that are gaining in years, or don’t want to risk blowing out their voices. But the VO should have exclusive control over when and how their voice is used and it should be stated in EVERY contract whether AI will be permitted and that rights to use said AI

Yeah, Nurses wear them at work because they are appropriate to wear in that environment. They have a functional purpose there. Wearing them out in a public or social setting isn’t.

If you read the article, you’d know the $200 dollar minimum is a fine you receive for violating the dress code. Jeans and sneakers are the common dress of most of the world. I never said you should have to dress formal or like it was a job interview, but their event their rules. you can bitch about it all you like,