No, its the perception of everyone not wearing crocs in a public place that it makes you look like a slob. Thats an overwhelming majority. Like just look around. If it didn’t make you look like a slob, everyone would be doing it. Like you said, its comfortable. But they don’t do it because they actually care about how…

I don’t think this is a measure that needs to be automated. I DO think records of a game’s chat and audio needs to be kept for a predetermined amount of time after to be used only for anti-harassment. I think a combination of laws to prevent other use, and a user agreement players agree to when they play should be all…

maybe not, but if you are gonna be a public face and compete in a public competition, don’t look like a slob doing it.

Man, blizzard just has a history of terrible interactions with its fanbase. Remember when everyone wanted Diablo 4, but they got a mobile phone game instead? Blizzard straight-up thought letting random crowd-goers ask questions without vetting was a good idea. Then some hero ripped them a new one all while the whole…

Lots of things feel comfortable but look terrible or are inappropriate in certain places. Pajamas feel great, but I wouldn’t wear them outside my home.

Actually no, emulators don’t break any US laws as long as they themselves don’t distribute games, pirated or otherwise. That precedent has been thoroughly discussed and established for ages now. Game companies don’t sue people like Dolphin because they’d lose.

That's great but what's to stop a bad actor not beholden to our laws and regulations from just not doing any of that?

“instances of EU law which change physical products around the world”

I feel like it’s a silly rule, but I get it. Crocks make you look like trash. White, hood, or otherwise

Well the fuck’em. Like I said, Nintendo doesn’t get to impose japanese law outside of Japan. They can bitch all they like there, but they need to stop wasting everyone else’s time outside Japan. They don’t like it, they don’t have to do business outside Japan and will lose out on the profit.

“the emu’s creators have spoken up and claim Nintendo’s suggestions that their software breaks the law are completely false.”

Fair, I guess I just thought given the context of the rest of my comment it could have been understood that we were assuming integrated batteries were not an option and it was a choice between AA’s and a removable one. But I could have phrased it better. They better be real tricky about how they restrict third party…

The question I posed was why go with AA’s when a removable version of what they already have is more practical and has the added benefit of meeting people’s expectations of battery life. They can’t charge repair fees with AA’s in the mix either. With the new regulations in place they've already lost our on those…

Typically devices who’s release precedes the date the regulation went into effect are exempt from them. but the switch’s successor won’t be.

If they do that, someone will inevitably come along selling better ones.

Nah. Battery life is such a selling point these days, using AA's would be a dumb move. I don't see why that can't just use what they use now, just in a removable form factor.

Have people forgotten Tom Cruze is a shitty person?

Did they forget to give him an attack or ability that destroys constructs like literally ALL the other bosses and boss-type monsters in the game?! Seems like a glaring oversight.

Get real. More like enjoy CoD before it's gone in 10 years. Sony has nothing to worry about.

I get it, but as someone still barely above the poverty line, it’s hard to feel bad for anyone making six digits, considering I probably do the same proportionate amount of work, or even more than they do. I work around these people all day. I do their IT, and its bizarre how I (and the rest of IT) keep a company…