To be fair, that man didn’t have the nuclear codes.

He already stated his political beliefs. We’re asking him to talk about them.

Yeah, he can do that, and we can take him to task for it and say it makes him a shit human being.

I mean, maybe, but he certainly has not been shy about signing any *other* executive orders without evidently listening to anyone but his inner circle.

That seems very much a best-case scenario...

And don’t get me started on Jeff Kent as a Cal alum/fan *and* a Giants fan...

Dammit, I always hate it when sports people/entertainers who I enjoy watching have political positions I will generously describe as “ill thought-out”. Call it “Adam Baldwin syndrome”

I should probably see it again. I saw it in high school when I didn’t really have much appreciation for shot composition and technique. I just remember the pacing feeling *very* draggy.

The Motion Picture is like a decent episode of the show stretched to 2-1/2 hours with an effects budget.

Who was trashing you? You keep rolling it out as an ad hominem insult and I wanted to know what it meant to you.

I doubt it. I and nearly every person I personally know (as an early 40s SF bay area resident) basically feel the same way. All politicians, particularly national ones, are compromised. That’s how things get done. But the idea that Clinton was somehow dramatically more devious, corrupt, or evil than any of the last 44…

You trot out the term ‘neo-liberalism’ like it’s meant to be damning. I’ll be honest, it sounds like something made up to trash centrist democrats because ‘neo-cons’ turned out to be synonymous with “let’s invade places and see what happens”.

I mean, the wealth gap had begun to narrow under Obama, albeit not nearly as quickly as progressives would like, but assuming she more or less stayed the course with Obama’s economic plans and team, I don’t see any reason to believe that things would have cratered economically.

I’m pretty sure we are “people who didn’t inherit a vast fortune.”

What’s your point? He wasn’t saying it was unrealistic, he was wondering why so many movies and TV shows (Agent May pulls this move all the time in Agents of Shield) use the same damn WWE move.

Holy shit I had no idea that was him. Awesome.

Umm, The Lion King is basically “Hamlet, but worse”. The fact that some other movie may have also borrowed from one of the most famous plays of all time hardly constitutes copyright violation.

As an atheist who sees this as a great piece of art and not some sacred relic. So what?

I think that’s just normal Sean Bradley...

That reminds me of a funny story. Actually it’s not so funny as it is long...