you’re not alone, friend. I shockshouted at certain quotes, totally freaked my dog out. I just couldn’t believe what I was reading...

“I guess we’ll come out wearing dresses tomorrow.”

You would think a feminist website might want to spend a little bit of time discussing sexism in politics, but nooooo, apparently the only sexism that exists is in the GOP. It’s so disappointing. I don’t even care if they support Bernie over Hillary, that is their right. But they still need to do their damn job and…

It’s widely being proclaimed that the interview didn’t go all that well for Sanders (theWashington Post is declaring it a “disaster”).

BUT THE QUESTIONS WERE HARD!!!! /s

They are excoriating him for it because he demonstrated that he lacked basic knowledge on a topic he talks about constantly. He isn’t wrong about how the system is fucked, but it is a problem that he has zero interest in figuring out how to fix it beyond giving speeches. I like the guy, but this is a serious flaw of…

I think Trump and Sanders supporters are equally out of their minds. Neither of these men have any clue what they’re doing or have put forth a reasonable plan for anything. They’re both just touting idealistic (whatever their sides’ ideals are) garbage. I imagine an argument between a Trump supporter and Bernie…

I recently read his tuition-free college plan and it’s crazy how it assumes that states will happily depend on Wall Street success in order to fund their universities (God forbid that economic downturns will happen).

Oy, Bernie. I mean, I don’t think the part about the subway is a big deal. If you don’t ride the subway, how would you know about tokens or cards or whatever. The other part sounds terrible!

My summary:

I think you kind of buried the lede on this. The president does not need to ride the subway. The president should have some concept of how they would execute their campaign promises.

So this is what it looks like when journalists finally start vetting Sanders, huh?

I’m just gonna say it: Sanders in an idiot.

Is it that much of an overstatement? It is one thing to not know specifics about every issue, but to not be able to coherently articulate an analysis and plan to deal with his main focus is concerning. That he talks about that issue 90% of the time makes his lack of comprehension even worse.

I assumed he was keeping…

Dude’s so goddamn vague about everything. I swear to god, I’ve seen a couple of speeches where he was actually more eloquent and informed about things. Is he trying to make it this generalised to keep up the whole optimistic “revolution” momentum going or what?

The man never expected to be this close. You can practically feel his panic in, “Oh SHIT, I actually have to explain how I’ll do it? I can’t just use my stump speech again?”

I like Sanders, but this interview is pretty bad. He has always appeared the least terrible option to me and will remain so. Obviously Clinton mouthpieces like the Washington Post will excoriate him over it and no doubt this comment section aka Clintonland will whilst pretending only Sanders supporters shovel…

Guys imagine if HRC had said something about fucking subway tokens.

It isn’t that he just doesn’t understand the repercussions, it was that he basically said “I’ll break them up” without having any idea or plan as to how to accomplish his primary domestic priority. It shows he is big on grand ideas but not detail oriented

Nor the obvious pandering she engaged in for Nicole Bell; she obviously knew she’d be running for President in 2008 and 2016 again. /sarcasm