“look, she signed on to medicare for all when it was released” turns out to be a pretty poor measure of where you stand on health care.

it’s always funny to watch liberals who were tripping over themselves to condemn someone to their left suddenly find themselves in agreement with the Brietbart refuse of the world, and making an embarrassed U-turn.

so did Kamala Harris. remind me what her take on that is today again

demanding to see more of John Delaney to own the libs

it’s astonishing because compared to 2008, 2016 might as well have been an episode of Teletubbies. as a reminder, in 2008 the Clinton party line was that all Obama Boys were a bunch of misogynist rapists-in-waiting following the orders of a secret muslim who ate dogs, and Clinton needed to stay in the race in case…

thing is, Elizabeth Warren’s made it quietly clear that she doesn’t want to push on Medicare for All. the Woman with the Plan is uncharacteristically quiet on the subject of health care policy, for, you know. reasons.

because you regularly tell yourself that anyone who tries to help the average worker must be feigning giving a shit to make you look bad, op.

whiggly’s job has resulted in some... predictable opinions, about what those uppity little shits asking his bosses to pay out have coming.

“if you tell people medicare for all will take away their medicare, they do not like it” is one hell of a take

it’s a shame what working in health insurance does to people. they know they’re killing people. they know they’re paid to kill people. they know, on some level, that their value add is measured in the people who died penniless, instead of getting the service they paid for.

and this “weekend” thing they’re talking about sounds like it might destroy the manufacturing industry

you do realize this is just “how dare you treat this like it’s more than a game” again, yes

warren supporters? clutching their pearls over how -dare- someone speak to their social betters in such a tone? what a totally unexpected chain of events. certainly not the kind of thing you could see coming a mile away, looking at the lily-white, male, upper-class demographic she pulls from.

the best of these are always the ones that are totally indistinguishable from what some centrist types actually believe.

ah, you weren’t following during the 2018 elections. fun story! one of those genius brainwaves of the moderate dems whose praises you’re singing was announcing to the good people of Tennessee “If I Had Been In The Senate, I Would Have Voted To Confirm Kavanaugh.” good ol’ Mr. Bredesen. sure, on the face of it, it’s a…

oh, there’s a host of other things to discuss. but that’s always been the detail that centrist apologists get the most squeamish about. not out of any sympathy for the victims, of course-the core of the philosophy in america has always been that black pain is the ideal sacrifice to maintain their betters’ lifestyles.

you might have missed the news, friend. last row we had about purity testing was back in July. Concentration Camps: Pro Or Anti.

remember. the Leader has done no wrong. the Leader can do no wrong. those who claim to have suffered under the Leader are tools of the Enemy, and must be ignored.

look up robosigning, friend.

and then, there are the people who know their job is to kill sick people for the crime of being expensive, slowly talking themselves into voting Trump out of fear that someone on the left might stop them from gorging on corpse-flesh.