after all, we mostly stole houses from black people to pay back the banks for crashing the economy. only the most left-wing nutcase could call that a bad idea. we all know they’re not really people.
after all, we mostly stole houses from black people to pay back the banks for crashing the economy. only the most left-wing nutcase could call that a bad idea. we all know they’re not really people.
if you are telling me that you think they’re on your side, when it comes to eating the rich, I have four words for you. “United States of Care.”
bonus piece of entertainment: the actual, no-shit stance of the Obama White House, and the pod boys themselves, on the Democrats losing the Senate was “well, who cares about the courts.” it would be easier, went the thought, to not have to get their agenda by that grumpy old fart Harry Reid.
hey, remember that time Jon was out there stumping for a health insurance company’s Please God We Have To Stop Medicare For All front group? it was called United States of Care. funny story.
there are allies of convenience, and there are people who are on your side. do not mistake one for the other. that is a large part of how we got here.
constructive criticism: maybe a program of “we make the banks whole by letting them steal black peoples’ houses” was not a good idea, and your attempt to defend it by whining about not liking a Splinter writer was fucking stupid.
what gives you the idea that Dan, Jon, Jon, Dan, Jon again, and their buddy the “george soros did it” republican strategist are on your side, when it comes to eating the rich
sometimes you just gotta give banks the go-ahead to steal homes from black people. otherwise the banks would have to pay out on their bad bets. and Timothy Geithner assures you: that would have made him SAD.
the part where young Breaker flipped out and ripped the clothes, lunch, and toys away from all the black kids present was generally agreed to be “maybe not the best” and “well bringing it up again might be divisive”
checked a mirror recently?
tossing kids into concentration camps, to own the left
interesting to see you taking the “we need more dems who are Kavanaugh-curious” tack.
remember, boys and girls! the only thing you can do that will get you a rebuke from Nancy Pelosi is saying “yeah I’m not voting for more concentration camps.”
Trump lost by three million votes
because moderacy excites noone, as you well learned back when you were playing support-monkey to the Tea Party.
i am not proposing running lefties as a magic panacea, my pragmatic friend. i am proposing running a candidate on a platform other than “I’ll Do The Same Shit As A Republican But I’ll Be Better With The Paperwork.” Doug Jones did not run on a platform of being marginally better at picking up fourteen year olds at…
we can tell 2016 was a one-off, and that “I’m A More Competent Republican” is a strategy not doomed to miserable, ignominious failure, because Bredesen, McCaskill, and Heitkamp employed it to such great success in 2018.
weird how your boy buttigeig isn’t getting any traction, huh. and after he went to all that effort to be a moderate on vaccination, too.
think of it pragmatically, my pragmatic friend
if she came out as being pro-Iraq war he’d probably change his tune