You’re basically calling someone who doesn’t keep screaming the n-word at random intervals a “coward”.
You’re basically calling someone who doesn’t keep screaming the n-word at random intervals a “coward”.
No-one has to do that.
You’re not compassionate, you’re just a fucking nonce who downgrades rape to “groping”.
Cool story, bro.
To imply that the rich don’t have massive (extremely direct) influence on what we, the people, can actually achieve under the governmental rule we find ourselves born in to is suspiciously naïve.
“The opposite of love is not hate, but indifference.”
Well... as everyone should know... humans are racist. This is one of the other great bits of knowledge that have come out of the social sciences.
Yes, I certainly would contend that the word evil has virtually no meaning if you put Pol Pot and an obnoxious youtuber accused of groping two women in the same comically expansive moral category.
There are a lot of intelligent humans I would never call wise.
*errr, universe (not world). LOL
Well... setting aside the apparent fact that Thanos really did target half of all sentient creatures in the universe (including plants)... I think “intelligent” fits the best. There are many more intelligent beings in the world than just humans.
It lacks the latin twang that makes sapient sound... fancy? It’s pretty…
Oh damn.
I understand it is technically appropriate, even more appropriate, but sapient also just means human so the juxtaposition was fun. Sapient can just mean human... which makes the science fiction definition seem very “earth-centric”.
They should be neither celebrated (why would you celebrate someone going from evil to good over someone being good the whole time?) nor reviled.
I think there are two powerful effects that prevent folks from grokking a comment like yours.
It’s not often that pedantry is this on point. This context nearly makes sapient an antonym for sentient (since they are trying to illustrate that there are a lot more “people” in the world that homo sapiens).
Yoshida’s response is already an admission that we’re talking about the game as a whole, rather than a single trailer.
I’m surprised when I win anything with a less than 50% chance (even though it certainly happens often, if you choose to broaden your scope enough to force those words to make sense). We’re, at least somewhat, arguing semantics here.
I mean... many of those people only had those jobs because he took a risk on the Metaverse.... and... he’s not entirely wrong to point out all the things, largely outside his control, that are impacting a lot of businesses right now.
With a 50 people room, the purple pal would turn up inside with a 39.5% chance.