I’m no Warren Buffet, but $80K+ cars that eek out 300 miles of range and look like...everything.
I’m no Warren Buffet, but $80K+ cars that eek out 300 miles of range and look like...everything.
Maybe in 2005, sure. The range is perfectly fine for 99% of what people will use it for, and it’s pricing is well within the norms of entry-level luxury brands and EVs. It also looks amazing, so it should do well.
But yeah, $80,000 for a Volvo? Oy vey!
I’ll admit it. The grille has definitely grown on me, especially with the 4-series.
Going from a Clydesdale to a Pinto is a lateral move. The ‘70 to the ‘71 Mustang transition is when the car lost its soul.
This situation is a bit different. The model went away entirely for decades and only the name was attached to something different. I think the post refers to a newly re-designed generation of a model that is worse than the one the year prior.
The plane manufacturer is the only reason this story was posted on here. This kind of issue happens every now and then and with a plane of this age, was likely due to a maintenance error not a manufacturing issue.
Hope it’s not the same plane.
Those kinds of things are long gone now.
Nobody is going to daily drive this. It’s going into somebody’s collection.
Am I the only one in this room who is old enough to remember the Ford Pinto?
Investigators believe the two women were trapped inside the Tesla with no way to escape, according to WABC.
I love Volvo wagons, but putting this much power into a structure that has the rigidity of a cooked piece of spaghetti by modern standards seems like a bit of a waste.
It looks stock enough. No one would ever guess what’s powering this brick.
Just install AdBlock on your desktop/laptop browser, and on your phone. I have for years and never have issues.
...also there is a Jeremy Renner joke in there somewhere...
I love to spend $4,200 on making my car look exactly the same.
It’s purty, but ND on somebody else’s project.
You’re getting into av geek pedantics with details the average Jalop on here wouldn’t understand. I’m boiling it down to the headline.
When you use the word “crash” in an article about two airliners, you know as well as I do that it means something different than if it involved two cars. People will assume a “plane crashing” means at least one of them was in the air.