cdg41324
CG
cdg41324

The graph is misleading. Social Security and Medicare have a separate tax that goes only toward those items. Discretionary spending is what is really important when it comes to government budgets. Here is the graph for that.

No problem with this; we mark parts up a straight %35 across the board, and %50 for labor. This is standard.

You embody everything that is wrong with retail auto sales.

You know that you can tell they are lying because their lips are moving can go both ways right?

And now, due to decreased food intake, it will be much weaker.

Isn’t this one of Trump’s stronger demographics?

A friend of mine was shopping a few years ago, and was out of work for a while after selling a house he’d inherited so his interest rate situation was expected to be a little rough. However, he had a perfect credit history as well as a military service record.

I promise it isn’t just a few people on Jalopnik, the no extra add-ons and fees dealership I bought my Jeep from has hundreds of positive online reviews and had a line of people ahead of me waiting to go through financing. They were selling more cars than they could handle and had competitive but not the absolute

Marketing 101...people hate fees, espcially for something that isn’t optional like completing the paperwork necessary to sell a car. Tacking on hidden and “mandatory” fees is an admission that the business model is flawed and relies on trickery and misdirection to sell cars. I paid about $750 more than the lowest

Here’s the other tactic I don’t get - insulting your manliness. If I say, “well I have to talk to my wife” and the sales guy gets all “what? You can’t decide this on your own?” it just pisses me off. That’s the quickest way to get me to go from “maybe buy” to “never buy”. I got so mad at a subaru sales guy who

I once went into a Chevy dealership because it was right next door to my wife’s appointment (and I didn’t feel like reading magazines). I was looking over Camaros because.... why not? A sales guy came up to me and asked if I needed help and I told him I was just killing time looking around because my wife had an

That’s insane. I once stopped by a dealer to test out a GTO, no intention of purchasing. I told the sales guy “if you can sell it for $25k I’ll take it”. The finance manager actually got really pissed at me because I wouldn’t budge, kept telling me there was no way he could sell it for that, to which my response

Had a similar experience when I went to buy a ‘14 Focus ST3. Had the sales guy email me itemized pricing on the ST as well as a “ballpark” trade in on my truck. My wife and I went out to the dealer. After they took the key to my truck and gave it a look over, they came back with a quote for the car that was $5k more

I appreciate that someone understands what we’re doing.

To answer your question, yes I did read the article. I am also a pretty active consumer of news on FCC regulation and action, since my current job is closely related.

I apologize that a delicate flower like yourself was forced to read this article and wilted at the hurtful words included in the title. Here’s a link where everything you can read will be 100% agreeable to your sensibilities: http://www.foxnews.com/

In this case, it’s not really click-bait. It’s entirely accurate and summarizes what they’re doing. Just because it’s not a 100% neutral title doesn’t make it click-bait.

It’s this sort of thing that is really telling about republican voters.

Knowing that the FCC is trying to limit consumer access, then actively rallying against it so that everyone can have affordable communications access is a lifehack in my book. Without knowing about what the FCC is doing or rallying against them, consumer internet access goes down one path, but with knowledge and

It really pays to be an informed citizen at the ballot. These are the consequences.