People won’t buy it at $7k and Apple will not have a viable business model.

If you increase the price to the end user, the end user will stop buying it, proving that the company doesn’t have a viable business model.

If your product is going to be sold in the US, at premium prices, than whoever made that product should also have premium wages.

Bro, you got replaced by a Pinto because of QUALITY issues. I am pretty sure that says it all. CP

Are there rules and regulations for track upkeep?

You were a complete ass starting from your first comment and now you are defensive because you feel dumb. I think is it just time for you to bow out.

Ah, fair enough. New to this site?

Hitler stash?

Where is this question coming from? Dodge is throwing their 707HP engine into a mommy mobile and you ask if horsepower is still a thing?

It is well known that the chase scene was the only watchable part of that movie.

Why would you think that? Every one of his tweets has ended in #FAKENEWS and now his base think everything from liberal media is fake. Seems your idea would work well for him.

For arguments sake, if the features I described cuts down accidents/deaths by 50% it shouldn’t be used on public roads because of cases where people step in front of cars?

Uh...because the self-driving cars can’t anticipate someone stepping on into moving traffic, it is pointless?

You are focusing on edge cases. Everyone is. There is a ton of bad driving habits that are already removed with self-driving cars. Look at the big picture and it is obvious that it is already safer, even if these edge cases still occur.

It is easy to be better. With self-driving you already remove of bunch of factors from the bad driving equation; abrupt stopping, cutting off other cars, crazy lane changes. Just those factors alone make self driving better (also safer). Then there are these edge cases where people step out in front of cars, which…

One of my pet peeves is when someone clearly misses their exit or turn and instead of accepting their mistake they still try to make it, cutting way over the lane markers. - or stop in the median area between the freeway and off ramp and wait to squeeze in.

There is a high speed rail in the works in CA for the Silicon Valley area. Apparently the feds are putting in 3.3 billion for it. Who knew? I still don’t necessarily agree, but if the feds are already funding these kind of projects than it doesn’t seem fair NY and the rest of the NE can’t get a piece of the pie.

Cool, then can I please get a high speed train from San Diego to L.A. please, because I am tired of dealing with the traffic and California pays way more in taxes than N.Y. does.

Unless we are allowed to interpret the Constitution or Gibbons v. Ogden, nowhere does it mentioning anything about funding, only regulating. There is a huge and obvious difference between the two. I am not trying to be pedantic here, but if you siting the Constitution or legal cases it has to be 100% clear and I…

Dude, as I said, I am from California, so let’s talk about a fucking tax burden. Funding for state projects should not come from the federal government