Yeah, I really want more explanation as to why she considered this a “necessary” conversation. Because I don’t get it. It seems like a recipe for making both people in the relationship feel like shit.

I need to tell my wife, who sometimes throws my arm over her shoulder, that she’s wrong and should feel possessed.

I mean from a person to person thing that makes total sense; people should respect their partner’s wishes. But it also seems like a weird thing to critique in other people’s relationships.

Yeah, but isn’t that everybodys expectation of NYC?

I see zero wrong with what she does. She’s showing her work off. What a big to-do!

Mental health issues aside, haven’t people figured out by now that when you act up so badly on a plane that they can’t take off or have to make an emergency landing, with literally dozens of eye-witnesses, the whole plausible deniability of “But I didn’t do anything wrong!” is preeeeeetty much out the window.

Yes, a transgendered person would be fraudulent if they didn’t inform their partner about their status. As soon as you’re contemplating sexy time with someone, your sexual history becomes their right to know.

Because she was assaulted by another woman? I don’t know, I think if this were a man that was preying on women like this, the tone of the article and the comments would be very different.

Why are we making excuses and ignoring the victim here? She was sexually assaulted. She was naive, vulnerable and inexperienced and this trust was abused in the most heinous way possible.

I don’t think the headline should use the word “seduced,” especially as it’s just been legally declared to be sexual assault.

Like many people, there was a time when I didn’t realize how important it is for gay couples to have the right to get married....until I realized everyone thought I sounded like kind of a jerk.

Is someone seriously suggesting that even asking this question is problematic? That in a “free” society, to even raise the question is wrong?

I was curious what they’d be investigated for. Asking a question where ‘no’ is the answer seems to be a weird thing to get in trouble for. Without watching the show, I thought it felt like one of those things where you ask a question to get everyone’s confirmation of agreement.

On August 25, two state lawmakers—Minnesota House Republicans Tim Kelly and Tara Mack—were issued citations by a park ranger for “making out” in a car. The pair, who are both married to other people, issued statements today apologizing for accusing the park ranger of lying about the incident.

To be fair, if you DO want kids (of your own) there is a point where those women are right. Having children later in life is more taxing on the body, and it’s not as ‘easy’ to get pregnant in the first place past a certain age.

How do people like this handle real life???? I really don’t undersand.

Wait, what? You don’t think Catherine has done anything wrong in this situation? Fuck your special day, Catherine, if you are defaulting on loans that you asked your aunt to cosign while asking for Kate Spade towels.

I agree. I don’t think the major problem is actually that the Aunt’s kid didn’t get a gift - it’s the irresponsibility that “Catherine” showed, both in not finishing college and financially, and the consequences this has had for the Aunt. It’s pretty clear that the Aunt is pissed as all hell about that situation, and…

The shout-out to Sibil Kekilli in this is weird; she concealed her past as a porn actress when she hit the mainstream as an actress in Head-On, and experienced backlash when a tabloid ‘outed’ her after that movie came out (her parents even broke off contact with her). I don’t know if that’s a porn-to-film success…