Agreed, it’s tough to bash a colleague, and equally tough to say someone shouldn’t get another chance. However, all signs point to the idea that Erdely knowingly cooked her story to achieve a narrative that was desired before the facts were researched (or attempted, somewhat lazily, to be researched). Sloppy reporting…
Catnado
catnado
It took me an extra hour to get this post done because I got utterly wrapped up in Googling "Red Sox Wedding Cakes"
Rolling Stone is still saying she’s an excellent reporter who will continue to write for them, but I do agree with you — I’m not sure how any of that is going to work.
That’s what people are speculating but this is one of those situations, I think, where the symbolism of disassociating the Magazine from her would actually mean something. Wenner saying she will write for the magazine again is a vote of confidence in her, even if she never actually does.
Well, Wenner has publicly stated that he would hire Erdely again. So... he might, he might not, but he didn’t have to make that statement.
I don't care what someone says in the chat window, as long as they keep *trying* to play the game, and I think that's the way most people feel. Unfortunately, it's when people decide to go off on their own, or afk at spawn, that ruins games.
Many people get stuck in the fashion era that they were first an adult. Many, many men of his age wear too big suits and the wrong shoes.
We like voleeroni.
While the site itself is 99% aggregated pictures lifted from other places, they appear to do some great work for charities and kids / people who need help, and the dudes who run it generally seem like nice guys. I'm hoping this is just a simple content error.
Vin runs his own FB page - no assistants, no bull. It's all him.
It's been decades since I've been a comic book fan (with the exception of much of the work of Alan Moore). But I think I'd need to know _why_ it was outselling the old comic before I declared that that was a [1] a good thing, [2] a bad thing, or [3] just a thing. And in category #3, it's possible that this just…
so you admit it's political and not based on the merits or lack thereof of the restaurant
I would imagine that they don't have that problem because they have strict guidlines about their posts. Everyone needs a stump and if you could post anything, they would.
Even in real life saying "I'm going to kill you" isn't illegal. Having the actual intent is. I'll assume the majority of people who live in this world have issued such a threat in an argument, especially if they are adults. Or they have said it jokingly. It must have happened at some point in their lifetime. Online…
are feelings more important than rights?
The founding fathers would ask..."So you want us to make bullying illegal? How old are you? Freedom of speech is infinitely more important than your feelings."
If you're staying at a nice hotel, tip the ever loving shit out of the guy doing valet parking, and ask him.
Pretty sure my tea-partying grandmother is more communist than China
And yet, here you are on a Gawker site that did the same exact thing with the same exact photos.