Finding themselves involved, I wouldn’t be particularly surprised if the Obamas quietly arrange Angel Reese’s attendance at the White House, perhaps by putting in an understated appearance of their own.

‘And what is your purpose for traveling out of Idaho?!’

Hopefully, this new information will force justices to adopt an ethics code and force Thomas to step down since he continues to abuse his power.

Forced by who?

Of course he should.  He’s not gonna do it though.

Saw this yesterday. It has a silly, dumb plot with more than a few holes, and agree there is a bit too much hand holding. But it was fun! And the kids thought it was fun! Enough well executed gags in its brisk 90 minutes to make it worthwhile. Dumb stuff can be fun for kids (and adults). 

Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter what the people want; most Americans support abortions, but GOP politicians play only to their base, so as long as they keep gerrymandering and lying to seize power, they’ll do whatever they want unless courts order otherwise.  With the Supreme Court now packed with activist…

“making this too costly to happen again is likely the only thing that will move the needle here.”

I think you have the nuance of this exactly right... You can feel how you feel, but you don’t get to control how others feel about you. You can control how you present yourself, but you can’t control what others see. You can make or avoid statements, but you can’t fully control whether or not your message is…

I kinda miss the good ol’ days when conservative (yes, I called her that) people would actually try and be nice...though still come off as bigoted and out of touch.

I told my grade school teacher wife about the Reese/Clark controversy, and her take on Biden’s statement is that, in good teacher fashion, she just wants to smooth over the conflict.

Yeah I didn't phrase that well. I meant yes, she already knows that so people don't need to be offended on her behalf or otherwise. 

“Why isn’t this non-politician, who has never held an elective office, so bad at politics?”

It was a case of a woman who has never played competitive sports, nor is a sports fanatic, trying to play peacemaker without realizing what the traditions are and how things would appear.

Pete isn’t chasing clout, he’s buried under an avalanche of it emanating from the women he’s dated.

Is that him setting up the paparazzi, or the more famous women doing it to show off their boy toy? Nothing about his behavior indicates it’s him. On the other hand, many of those women stars have repeatedly publicized their flings and relationships.

Wait, so Jezebel is blaming Pete Davidson for orchestrating a “blatant publicity campaign” and not, say, Kim MFing Kardashian? Or are you saying that him getting his picture taken with another famous person in public places like courtside at NBA games (and then Jezebel constantly reporting on it) is some sort of…

The lawyer’s statement is misleading. Grabbing a phone is not the same as initiating physical force. At most the texts say she denies he strangled her. But the texts suggest the injuries do exist. The question is how did she get these injuries? Also where are the written statements recanting? The lawyer’s posturing…

In fairness, you are dismissing the cabal of leftist activist judges in GQP fever-dreams and rhetoric

Putting both tournaments under the same umbrella and interlacing the days when games are played was such an obvious call. NCAA tournament fans who might not normally watch women’s games get the jones and tune in, and the teams get that extra exposure.  Win-win.