I meant ot does taint.

the Smith family has been focused on deep healing. Some of the discoveries around our healing will be shared at the table when the time calls,

President Biden’s proposed budget calls for a $3 billion increase for drug control efforts, including an increase in funding for drug enforcement and for US Customs and Border Protection.

But as to so what? I would argue producing grey propoganda doesn’t taints the argument (or at least argue) as immoral, regardless of if your adversaries are worst.

I don’t think that’s the case. Even assuming the opinion/ruling/order isn’t incredibly fact-specific (and therefore limited to these facts and this case,) and further assuming that it announces some handy rule of general application... it’s still just a a district court ruling, the lowest level of Article III court.…

If I had to guess, I’d say it’s probably a jurisdictional issue having to do with where the arrest literally/actually took place (i.e., at/within an airport.)

She should be disbarred from any and all bar associations of which she’s a member. I can’t speak for every bar association’s rules of professional responsibility, but at a MINIMUM, these comments are 100% violative of the model rules of professional responsibility, which form the basis for probably every individual…

But isn’t that essentially a bad faith argument?

The Justice Department also claimed it won’t appeal Mizelle’s ruling unless the CDC believes the requirement is still necessary. As of now, it’s unclear what the CDC’s next move will be.

Weren’t coat hangers pretty much always overplayed as a literal symbol? I thought home remedies and other unsafe poisons were by far the most common illegal abortions gone wrong.

The next issue is the coat hangers, which, as symbols, are outdated and harmful, because they suggest that all illegal abortions will be unsafe.

people could just be better, and not elect horrible assholes to Congress in the first place.

To my eyes, there’s a significant thematic overlap between this type of influencer and something like findom dominatrices. The difference, of course, is that, in the findom space, there’s (purportedly at least,) some discussion and thought given to the ethics getting people to blow their money.

“maybe a staffer in a parking garage, maybe 100 yards away.”

Then, as the officer was on top of Lyoya to subdue him, he fired his gun into the back of his head.

the joke is homophobic because it relies on a guy blowing another guy being seen as a sacrifice.

His electorate likes him.

It seems to me the joke is that Cruz is so homophobic he’d rather people continue dying of starvation than to put his mouth around another man’s penis; what’s more, I would argue that putting your mouth on a penis for the utilitarian purpose of ending world hunger does not constitute a “homosexual act” anymore than…

I guess it was too much to hope for that she’s be like, “this is place feels like me,” and it turns out to be Pee Wee’s Playhouse.

Yeah, how is being petty working out for us, eh?