RIP hardcore players. 

You mean “at will” states. “At will” means that either the employee or the employer can end the employment relationship for any reason (that’s not illegal) at any time. “Right to work” has to do with not having to join a union in a unionized workplace.

I’d like you to point out what I said that you’re describing as “confidently speaking on what’s going on here”.

I think it indicates that he was enough of a pain to work with that no one wants to anymore.

Okay, then what is it exactly you want here if it’s not for them to have associate with this man until the evidence reaches some level that you deem acceptable? What they have done to him is stop associating with him personally and professionally, which is more or less all that’s within their power to do. The only…

You sound like a rapist that got away with it. 

For anyone else who, like me, didn’t follow the story closely from the beginning, here’s the original article where the victims’ stories appeared. This was not a juicy, unsubstantiated rumor picked up by a gossip blogger on a tight deadline. There was extensive corroboration of the victims’ accounts, and while the…

I mean that’s not really what I said, lol, but whatever. The point is, anyone’s career can be effectively ended for any superfluous reason whatsoever, for reasons a lot less meaningful than “two detailed accusations of rape.” Are you familiar with the arc of Brendan Fraser’s career.

You may want to sit down for this, but no one has a right to an acting career. Due process is for people facing criminal charges, since those can lead to being fined, imprisoned, or even being executed by the state.

Well, it’s possible that the teams from SATC and The Equalizer weighed these three separate accusations along with the restraining order his ex got for physical abuse and decided someone with that much baggage wasn’t a sound business investment.

The vast majority of states in this country are right to work states, which means there is no such thing as due process in getting fired. I think you may be talking about the legal system, in which case, this dude was “not canceled” in those terms.

I think you’re making a big, evidence-free leap (odd how often you do that for someone who purports to be so concerned with evidence) from “don’t send happy birthday texts” to “didn’t consider what he had to say.” He issued a public statement purporting to refute the claims. What else are they supposed to consider…

I’m not really sure what to make of this. I do recognize that false accusations of rape happen, and I can only imagine how painful that must be for the accused. But then you liken your experience to this actor, who has been accused of assault by two different women and of inappropriate conduct by a third, and you…

Okay, I’m not quibbling with whether they “acted,” but pointing out it’s not acting on blind faith, it’s acting on the basis of believing one piece of evidence over a contrary piece of evidence. And there is at least just as much evidence that it did happen as evidence that it didn’t, something you seem to be…

Thats the whole problem. Things like you can happen. But he can also be a weinstein or cosby or r kelly etc etc.

Grow up. You aren’t entitled to due process before someone decides not to send you a birthday text. 

“But why should I be treated like a criminal if I don’t believe I’ve committed any crimes?”

let me play a tiny violin while you tell your sad story, Chris. Many people in the industry are completely horrible to work with and he is notoriously known to be a BIG arsehole.

he absolutely does but Nandor is never going to do better than Guillermo

Guillermo deserves better than Nandor.