This was safer...

I mean it’s in the name...

No, my theory was about this particular ad campaign. And I don’t know why you would think they weren’t pressed for participants, given exactly what they’re asking people to do. I’d think their choices were heavily limited. Hard time imagining someone who thinks this is the direction to go with advertising would scoff…

I think the purpose of the ad is to get you interested in the brand, at which point you will go look at the catalog. They can’t really showcase their style in a single image, but they can create “buzz”. Then maybe you’ll stop by a store.

I think the point is to interest you enough to get you to actually go look at their clothes, not show you everything they make in an ad. That’s pretty counter productive when you consider how little time people look at ads. Ads have different purposes. Some really good ones never show you the actual product. They make…

You think it might have anything to do with self selection...I mean these people agreed to participate. I doubt they instituted a quota system.

Plus if you buy a house for 150,000 you probably paid 300,000 for it

I don’t believe he get’s paid if he retires, unless he works out a deal with the team different than the contract (because they’d rather see him leave than sit the bench for whatever is remaining on the deal). Unless it’s due directly to injury.

I really don’t understand the idea of telling people they have to physically interact with someone they don’t want to. What the hell does “respect for the game”(which is in and of itself a bs concept) have to do with her specific issue with one coach. She’s not ignoring the other players.

I mean, if you have reason specifically to dislike someone, the way she acted initially is exactly how she should have handled it. She didn’t make a big deal out of it, but she doesn’t have to pretend either. she didn’t want to touch him and didn’t. That’s ok. There’s nothing wrong with that.

What are you even talking about. Not high fiving someone does not merit punishment, or the balancing of some karmic scales. He knew why she didn’t, he should have walked by and hit up the next girl in line. That’s it. No need to invoke Nemesis.

It’s not a know better situation, what she chose to do did not warrant any kind of physical response from him. How he responded to it was what an asshole does when he thinks you won’t do anything about it, which a lot of coaches of “kids” seem to behave.

He would know why she doesn’t want to high five him tho, and should have simply moved on, not touched her. You don’t touch someone with reason not to like you. Then check his reaction to hers, he’s super pissed.

A dude would have punched him back.

Pretty sure you wouldn’t push a male player. Coaches shouldn’t be touching players at all. She don’t like the guy, she doesn’t have to shake his hand. Doesn’t give him the right to do anything but be salty.

I mean obviously not, warcraft is still immensely popular, it just hasn’t had a single player release in almost 2 decades. I’ve always loved SC more.

A question you ask after the first and second time. After the third, you get a bunch of big ass rocks. Apparently.

A lack of snow is no diffeent than a lack of rain. I’d bet the temps were as low as usual, there was just no precipitation. A drought is a drought, summer or winter.

I think the question of how they got it is kind of vital tho, because in all likelihood the answer is thru exploiting the other poor people around them in some way. There’s almost literally no other way to. That people don’t hate them is not dissimiliar from the popularity of gaudy drug dealers and pimps in American…

I mean, what kind of logic are you assuming they’re using for any leadership positions, given what they’re working with?