Hell; world history.

NO, I WOULD NOT LIKE TO PLAY A NICE GAME OF CHESS.

DON'T YOU CALL ME NAAAAMES!!!

Ignore…what? Now you're just throwing out vaguely-authoritative sounding things. You're really bad at this.

"He was one of the first business leaders to agree to allow trans people to use the bathroom of the gender they identify with."
I know you know this one, but: Source?

Instead of telling anyone else how not to play (dumb), maybe you could stop with contradicting your most treasured viewpoints. The Press needs to keep the gov't in check: Yes! But it reports on actual things the administration has said and done: Boo!
Do you not see how this makes you look like a whiner at least?

"Try to follow along here."
And you should try to not be smug when you've not only done a shit job of making your actual point, but now seem to be going back on your main assertion -It's Obama!- with "I'm not blaming Obama…"
Fucking A, what is it with you people and your inabilities?

"None actually committed, but plenty planned."
PROVE?

Also no. The Obama-era list was compiled of those viewed as an actual threat to national security. What's happening now is a great deal more random than that, if anything.

No, you're just a decidedly average troll, who isn't trying to reach any greater understanding; just trying to play Gotcha, but y'ain't got no gotchas.

Oh, I love it. You get to make unverified assertions all night and then ask the rest of us to back up out points, which we do*, and then you get to back out like the blushing violet you are because (gasp!) someone called you something! Oh dear!
This is what -as always- gives the lie to that idea that it's liberals who…

Actually, the rest of us are still waiting to see you "prove" your original assertion. It's fun that you think the burden of proof is on the rest of us, but it ain't. Jump in.

Another one that "has yet to occur" but should not occur at all is the end of the EPA. The point is not that it hasn't happened yet. That's some sophism at its finest.
Now, source for what? You're the one making assertions.

Regardless of whether or not thing "has yet to occur," a stated goal of the administration is the repeal of the ACA. That is something they have said they want to do; it's how it gets replaced (if at all) that is the actual unknown.

That "false story" is one that everybody from the DHS to the White House itself felt pretty okay about, until people started calling it batshit policy, and then they got all mad, as usual, about people commenting on actual things they were doing. No Falsehood!

Oh shit, what other blather did you spew up there. "No wrongdoing found," eh? Was wrong-doing looked for? And was it looked for by people who weren't political allies of the person we're talking about here? And was the investigation largely about leaking itself, rather than contents of said leaks, etc. etc. etc.…

Ooh, and wait; where'd we get that "94%?"
Doesn't matter. But here's the thing: yes, a blanket ban of people from a handful of countries in the middle east has indeed occurred. The fact that one of the countries didn't happen to be Saudi Arabia -which has historically produced more terrorists to actually strike at…

While they do receive some funding from the Gummint, none of it goes to abortions. So while your point is literally true, it has nothing to do with the point you're trying to contradict. Try harder.

You know, that's interesting. Because I don't really think Oklahoma state senators are people, either.

The guy is a bad enough writer, he actually might not have realized it could be taken that way.