canttakeitback
20thCentric
canttakeitback

Does it really? How many desirable results do you get that could possibly make it worth that much work? I'm thinking 100 is kind of on the low side for # of misses per hit.

You could try starting a convo the same way you would anyone else. Joke about something. Make a clever observation. Ask her /tell her something interesting about the venue. Making small talk is a lost art apparently, but at least it doesn't have to immediately be concerned with your appraisal of her appearance.

Or how about do what bars do. No cover/free drinks for ladies. (In other words, men should be the ones supporting the service if they are going to be using it for their personal glory hole)

The point is it's not the appropriate forum to propose casual sex. THERE ARE PLENTY OF SITES AND CATEGORIES OF SITES THAT EXIST FOR THAT. Leave the people who are looking for authentic connections alone!!!!

It's like getting tons of spam intsead of personal emails. It's discouraging because out of 200 responses, all of the are junk except 2, which doesn't feel like that many choices. It's why I don't date online. If the ratio of sex propositions to sincere inquiries is 100,000:1, I'd really rather try my luck in person.

I don't believe this person. Yeah, you can say I am looking for long-term soul-mate, serious inquiries only, I am not going to have sex with you, and you will STILL get plenty of fuck offers.

Corset hack: cut the tops off of your boots and attach the hook/eye fastenings on the edges without the laces (it used to work when I was thin, young and had no shame)

Calling it a vice may not be much worse than calling it as a disease as it affects people's attitudes, it seems. Although I like to think public attitudes have changed for the better so far.

What's weird is that the thinking used to be that if we "pathologized" it, it would be exempt from judgement. But obviously that's not true. In fact I think that what really needs to be done, which was mentioned earlier, is people to search themselves for where their beliefs really come from, and if it's religion,

I think you have to drink to become an alcoholic. You don't go around lusting after it without having experienced it.

Wait, I think I know that song...

Yeah I agree born this way is a problem, because then the anti-gayers will start drawing equivalencies to pedophilia, and treat it like an orientation —"it may be an involuntary desire, but it is irresponsible to act on it". Which I guess makes perfect sense if you already just know in your gut that homosexuality is

I was asking the lady attorney. But maybe she quit.

Not only that but I wonder if divorces are harder for only children? I can only speculate but it seems like if you have a sibling, you've got an ally if parents start acting out or playing the kid against each other.

Do fewer women go into law than men? I wasn't under that impression.

If that's the first line of the next E L James book, I don't want to read it.

Most rapists are opportunists; sexual abuse/assault victims don't necessarily correspond with the attacker's orientation. Sexual abuse of boys is committed by heterosexual men in the majority of cases. Sexual abusers may target certain "types" but above all other things, they are abusers. Cases of molestation of

Score for Let'sBe.

How did your cheap microwavable trash italian food ever become a war over who could be more inclusive.