He crated a universe of aggressively sanctimonious, hypocritical assholes that helped turn America into the shithole it is today.

Boy, it’s almost as if having an army of well-paid publicists, stylists and record producers can take you far in America.

Yup. We moved on to post-Boomer nostalgia.

We should call this “pulling a Josie”

Miss Janet probably has better things to do than relive this nonsense on record so that everything can be re-hashed by the tabloids.

Ok, this has got to be exhibit A in “people the AV Club doesn’t need to bother giving attention to.”

No, I had a feeling.

The first Robert California appearance was sheer genius. After that, not so much.

When the show was good, Michael was not a sympathetic character. He was the villain. His villainy was being the sexist, racist, narcissistic asshole boss. As the show went on, it started wanting to make Michael sympathetic and it took a significant downturn in quality as a result.

The work environment being toxic was an intended part of the show. It was never meant to make the audience feel comfortable.

I think this is a good criticism of the Office. The British version allowed its characters to be not likable, which is why I liked it a little better.

The truth is most people will never form a clear, informed opinion with what happened or might have happened, because most people still think “Woody Allen married his daughter”, because most people don’t care to read and/or retain more than clickbait headlines when it comes to these kinds of things.

I bet teenagers think this guy is hilarious.
Teenagers are idiots.

This guy looks like a bad parody of a YouTube star in some subpar “ripped from the headlines” Law & Order episode.

At this point I’m less interested in why the Zs keep shoving their family issues down the public’s throat, than I am in wondering why the public acts like this is something worth consuming. I cheated on my girl once, she didn’t make a music video over it. She just wrote very negatively about me on Facebook and had her…

I liked the original. Because of it’s slightly class conscious story. Russell’s beefy carpenter didn’t “make” an amnesiac fall in love with him. He told her they were married to get his lost wages out of cheap “wife” work. Which the movie makes clear, was also wrong. So this could be also a take on gender roles. Or it…

In the original he had no intention of tricking the woman into falling in love with him, he just wanted her money and servitude because she was a heinous beast of a rich snob. He was dismantling the class system! Not sure how this is any different. Still kidnapping and Stockholm Syndrome. Listen, the original was hard…

And I thought he got sober..........

I just feel they’re very superficial, masquerading as deep. And I associate it with that very commercial, consumerist, lean-in type feminism.