Speaking of Megan, don't you think that if they replaced the blonde hair with black, we'd have a Megan Fox on the cover instead of Lindsay? They seem to have gone for the same beauty ideal.

I'm sure people would've still figured out she is an Olsen, given how alike they seem.

Well, I agree that "reverse racism" is ridiculous. There is no such thing. However, how can we expect equality (at one point) if we are not willing to treat everyone as an equal? We cannot say we are against the objectification of women, if we are going to objectify men. Yes, we are not at that point yet, and sadly it…

Oh no, I think we are in agreement. My second thought was just me generally being a negative nancy, in that even if objectification with consent is not as bad, a woman in this same situation would be even more commodified than the men are being right now.

I agree with you and @titchytiny that if women chose to be part of the site it might make me feel better. However, I have the nagging suspicion that women would be commodified even more, by putting them into types according to body type, appearance, etc. rather than by personality or some other characteristic as what…

Wow, I just wrote the same thing above. Good to know I wasn't the only one giving this the side-eye.

I don't know, it seems pretty progressive but also double standard-ish in my opinion. If it was a Web site that let men "shop" for women, dividing them into types, wouldn't we be all up in arms about it?

Except she doesn't drink, and says people who drink just "aren't cute". Nah, I don't think she seems fun at all. :(

Man, I'm just in the third season of Weeds, and people keep saying this. It makes me not even want to keep watching anymore :(

I miss her old style as well, but this is still fun.

I absolutely love drunkenly singing to this!

Yeah the one in the middle is Natalia Jimenez, and like you, I'm also not so impressed by her first single :(

I want to thank you also! I love it when Latin celebs are featured on here.

I'm not upset at the ad getting banned because it will make me feel bad about myself. I'm upset because they are doing the wrong thing. Instead of banning one kind of body type, wouldn't it be better if all kinds of body types were featured?

Uh no. It's not "thin privilege" when you've had people tell you you're probably anorexic, you need to eat more, ew you're so skinny!(by fat girls) etc. all your life. Try again.

So no offense, but then you go ahead and make an offensive comment? Snarking on a person's body, no matter whether you're snarking on a fat girl or a skinny girl, is still wrong.

I thought rosy cheeks were an imitation of the flush you get when aroused? As far as big eyes, because it makes you look healthier. Wasn't that it?

Um, don't assume things by a picture. I'm much thinner than that and have always been regular.

Oh my god. I want to do this to my cat but she would murder me in my sleep.

Huh. My cat is always looking for ways to steal my candy.