Megan should not be writing for publication. If “managing editor” means “lining content up to post at the right times”—essentially “making the trains run on time”—then maybe she’s qualified for that part of the job. But anything involving words, or concepts--no.

Quite a yappy little ankle nipper, isn’t it...

Still wrong. Kill this erroneous quote mark:

Sorry you have to put up with idiocy like this.

You need to re-locate that close-quote mark.

If you didn’t want to read the book from the outset, why did you review it?

Look over all of Megan Reynolds’ book reviews. She hasn’t liked a single one.

Number one rule of book reviewing: Review the book in front of you, not the book you fantasize about reading.

I love that Jezebel has, for some reason, decided Megan is qualified to write book reviews.

Because even by Jezebel’s barely-existent standards, Lauren Evans is an exceptionally nasty and careless writer?

Or just skip all posts by Katie altogether and thereby avoid garbage posts on any topic.

...a television show that is not deep but has the aesthetics of deep and so is often mistaken for deep.

Then maybe Jezebel shouldn’t cover it.

“...never spoke to me.” Everything you need to know about the success that Jezebel—and all of G/O Media—have had at “journalism” is contained in this phrase. All the unreturned calls, all the unanswered emails. No credibility. No respect.

And doesn’t Jezebel pride itself on the fact that at least 50 percent of its writers are people of color?

Also fascinating that Rich writes a blog post about every two weeks, and according to the G/O union contract, as a “senior writer” he gets $70k/year.

This sums up the Jezebel (and G/O Media) record of “journalism”: a trail of unreturned calls and unanswered emails.

How did this story get assigned to Rich?