cameronra
Yinzanity
cameronra

Oh definitely. The dark money factor through SuperPACs needs to die immediately. While the above the board stuff looks weak, comparatively, it’s the dark money that is the major threat.

TL;DR: It means the banks are going to gamble with your money until it all collapses again, and then the ruling class is going to steal more of your property, force your wages further down, and raise your rents and every other expense.

Ah, the “where did I actually say that, despite the implications of what I said,” rebuttal. Always edifying.

He’s a troll.

And now you are in a place where you can gleefully punch down on the woman left behind with ten children to care for.

If there’s one thing I know, its that regulations made in direct response to a major national catastrophe should be repealed immediately. Banks should be allowed to make complicated deals that no one understands, night clubs don’t need fire exits, and everyone knows that the only way to secure our airplanes is if

If/when Pruitt is fired/steps down, you just know that anything of value in his offices that isn’t nailed down or red hot will go mysteriously missing and he’ll never have to answer for it. It wouldn’t surprise me if he’s already figured out a way to siphon off EPA funds into his own accounts as well.

Please edify me as to why the anthem playing or not playing is relevant in relation to an employer being able to set a code of conduct for employees?

I think we all can agree that kneeling for the anthem is a political statement. If that is the case, standing for the anthem is also a political statement. So if the NFL can force it’s players to stand for the anthem, it can force them to make a political statement they may not agree with. Just think about that for a

I think you have it backwards. It’s the owners who are introducing a political event into the workplace, by playing the national anthem and demanding a demonstration of obedience to the state.

If the employer is making a political statement and forcing employees to agree with it or stay quiet, that’s a civil rights issue. If the employer wants to engage in political campaigning on his own time, that’s one thing, but doing it during the workday while denying employees the right to their own expression is...

Wow, if you really are a management consultant and think “an employer has the right to have a code of conduct” is the same as “no matter what is in that code of conduct is ok and the employees can’t complaint because the employers have a right to the code of conduct in the first place”, well, congratulations, there’s

Saying she had plastic surgery and is recouping is hardly unfit for office conspiracy. She doesn’t do anything. We don’t really care, in fact no one does including his base.

stationary

Would you agree that both standing for the national anthem and not standing for the national anthem are political statements?

Does your employer engage in the political act of playing the anthem at the start of your workday? And did your employer allow itself to get bullied into its decision by a U.S. President with a stated interest in stoking outrage and division?

You think it’s the left that looks foolish when it’s the Republican party that’s tripping over their own dicks even as they control every branch of government?

Everyone knows he’s a liar. 45-50% are outraged by that, 40-45% believe him uncritically and always will or at least pretend to because they believe he is providing them with something they want, and 5-15% believe it’s unremarkable because he’s a rich person/celebrity/politician and they see taking a stance on it at

You’re trying to justify gross, flagrant abuses of very basic human rights with lame welfare spooking. They’re entitled to not being enslaved even if they were all mass murderers in their home countries who came up here to continue their spree. It’s almost like you’re a sniveling racist rat who doesn’t