Irregardless, it's a whole nuther topic

Is that really "winning"?

Yeah, my strobe set-up is 4000 ws in addition to nearly 10,000 watts of 5600k daylight CFLs and it still takes 15-20 seconds

The not smiling thing was based in 3 factors. 1, they were emulating the old oil-painting portraits. 2, the exposure times can be over 10 seconds, depending on the lighting conditions, and trying to hold an expression that long is very difficult. 3, Dental hygiene has vastly improved since that era.

The ISO is roughly .5 to .75. I have a cople of those headrests myself. The sitting times vary depending on you chemistry and the available UV light. In my studio it takes 15-20 seconds and on a bright day outside, 3-4 seconds.

I went there last year and it was great. My favorite images were the Autochrome Lumiere. The original camera owned by Louis Daguerre was pretty awesome, too.

Ok, let's dispense with the bogus idea that portraits done with either Daguerreotypes or the wet-plate process took minutes. It didn't and still doesn't. How do I know? Because I practice this type of photography.

'nilla, please.

My…name…is a…killing…word
A.A. Muad'dowd

“See this movie!”
- A.A. Dowd A.V. Club

Where does the pool go when you view his deck from below?

Lisa?

This beloved franchise is skipping guardian-mode and slowly transforming into a dumpster fire.

Who's he playing? It better be Ben. He plays a good lunk-head.

7-Zark-7's hands kept changing. It confused and infuriated me.

We all die alone, living alone is the problem

Yes, I hate housework.

Like I said when I turned on the vacuum last week, this sounds like it's going to suck.

Great, I can get 501st Legionnaires disease.

I remember 120 Minutes and the local college radio station being the only source of "alternative" music available when I was stationed in some fly-over state in the early '90s. Everything else was classic rock, country or gospel.