XD I’d say he was already waiting outside and gave up—came in. Ditched some things and decided to play.

If this ends up where you can pick different eras with different assassins, areas are added to support a story, and still single player, I can be ok with that. But if this ends up trying to be something like Destiny where there’s lobbies of people running around and you join each other on missions....I don’t think I…

This alone makes me want to re-purchase the game and try it again. I had traded it in because I got sick of the weapon durability system, but if I can largely do away with that, that’s tempting.

Ok, so do you get mad at Costco and Sam’s Club for selling the consoles too? Those places are also paid memberships.

Technically you can play the game you already own free of charge.

Ghost of Tsushima is one of my all-time favorites, so I’m hyped for this. The fact that this is coming out on my birthday is extra awesome. :)

So, $30 for the DLC and and PS5 enhancements.

You can just upgrade it for $20 on PS4 or $30 on PS5.

It’s all right there in the article.

Yeah, 100% “I’m fine with this.” They have limited stock, they’re making it so their paid subscription is more available. It’s been 8 months. If it was on launch for the console, that’d be aggravating and there might be an issue, but for restocks? Go for it, GameStop, I’m more okay with this than weird-ass bundles.

Honestly, I spend so much money at Best Buy that I thought they should’ve done something similar during the PS5 launch or at least launch window. Why not reward your loyal customers instead of letting any asshole potential scalper off the street buy it ahead of you? I understand you don’t want the walled gardens and…

What's the problem here? They didn't have stock available for everyone, so they chose a method that rewarded their customers and probably also cut down on scalping. They probably got more consoles in the hands of gamers who actually wanted them than went to people who just want to flip them. 

I will say that it gets easier. I got a little tangled in it for a while with a friend of mine—I didn’t have any objections to using their pronouns at all, but it felt a little clumsy in certain contexts (particularly when referring to them as a family unit with their partner vs them in the singular sense) but it’s…

It absolutely does not and this is a boring and shitty take. Singular they/them usage is older than singular you by several hundred years and even if it wasn’t it is the pronoun that many of us chose to you. As plenty of people in the world have pointed out time and again you use singular they/them all the time to…

“Alas, poor Yorick6969420, I knew him, xHoratiox23897. A fellow of infinite cash, of excellent weaponry. In heists he hath born me on his back a thousands time and oh, how abhorrent a pilot was he. The memories haunt me.

Nobody buy this, I want a PS3 version.

“but it’s been anything but an easy road to get there.”

Everyone knows that it’s technically more difficult to animate non-white non-cis women character models. Programmers have just recently cracked the code for animating female models. Just wait 5-10 more years, the technology just isn’t there yet!

That’s weird, because it clearly says “Battlefield V.”

At first glance I read the title as “seven deadly Sims” and thought “Weird, but I’m okay with this.”

Obligatory